Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Politics4US
Because the voters were more familiar with Palin than Bachmann, Cain, or Perry. They may not have bothered to listen to them much, hoping that Palin was going to be running. Her daughter said last summer, that her mother definitely knew whether or not she was running. No one would have cared about “Undefeated” or some of her speeches if she wasn’t going to be running.

Again, how does this change the pool of candidates. If your definition for harm is minor changes in the dynamics of the race, which is obvious, then you're not really saying much.

154 posted on 10/10/2011 12:58:05 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: csense

Good luck trying to reason with that fool, Politics4us, he hasn’t made any sense all night here, but he has found an imagined slight to complain about and wants to bitch to anyone who will listen. My patience has about run out!

JC


159 posted on 10/10/2011 1:16:25 AM PDT by cracker45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

To: csense

I am saying that Palin’s supporters who were counting on her running did not lend their support to other candidates. If you don’t agree with that, then the media was right that Palin lacked a large group of support.


172 posted on 10/10/2011 8:51:54 AM PDT by Politics4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson