Posted on 10/08/2011 11:48:19 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
Worth a try, anyway...
Gee, pot/kettle. You have one of the worst obsessions of any poster for SP. Get a life,find a date,watch a football game. I have an idea, you could sew your Halloween Costume and you still have time to make that SP “troll” Costume. You could put a little Mama Grizzley Bear with a red hat on your costume’s head,and have a teeny weeny Ipad attached to the troll hand.
“Lets elect him first and then find out if he can walk the walk? Is that it? Or is it that he sounds like Sarah so he must be Sarah?”
Greene66’s comment that Cain “still has a lot of vetting” is the opposite of what you’re alleging.
She met with Fox around Memeorial Day. They probably asked her if she was about to announce.
When one says that they are not about to announce in May, it doesn't mean that they won't announce in September.
She drove a truck over too many people in the pursuit of the fake campaign.
Nonsense. She never said that her bus tour was a campaign.
She is a very reasonable person, very committed to America, and that's why she decided not to run.
There is no record to vet. Only rhetoic.
There’s one really, really. Really important quality about Palin as GOP candidate, in this election cycle, which I don’t think Mrs. Palin herself would have factored into her own calculus - but is quite critical in the context of a GOP victory, and moving the right things forward.
It’s something she and her family are keenly aware of, but ironically would in her mind be considered a huge negative in her decision making - although in truth it is the biggest positive one can imagine.
The quality, and strength is - Palin has been vetted beyond any candidate in recent history. Perhaps ever.
We really do not know how our candidates will fare, when the left really goes after them. Cain looks like he’s good and ready to stand toe-to-toe. But what if there’s something in his history which is just plain a knock-out punch, when used as propaganda?
I’m not saying there is, but we KNOW FOR A FACT Palin’s got no surprizes out there.
She looks at that process and sees a nightmare.
For the GOP it’s pure magic. And very, very powerful in what will be a hard-fought election for the future of America.
Naturally it’s her choice, but no harm making it clear, she’s welcome to change her mind.
That’s all I’m saying. No bridges burned...
3 words:
Give
It
Up
Cults of personality are never good. Get behind the ideas and forget about the importance of the vessel that you are putting them in.
People always disappoint. Even George Washington and Winston Churchill were flawed.
Put your faith in the personal liberty and the causes that forward that.
Governors,especially ones that are close to an enemy such as Russia have that experience.
Your overdramatazation of his record is hurting him. He is a really amazing man, and with the right amount of training,education, and good advisers, he could be ready.
Stop denigrating SP to make HC look better qualified, it is not happening. You are making a difficult situation more complicated. Try to not embellish, we are going up against the corrupt scums of the earth ,and we need to be on our game.
I agree, when Palin says no, it will most likely remain a no.
Now compare that to Perry. When he says "no" he won't run for president to the voters of Texas, it doesn't mean a thing.
3 words:
Give
It
Up
Cults of personality are never good. Get behind the ideas and forget about the importance of the vessel that you are putting them in.
People always disappoint. Even George Washington and Winston Churchill were flawed.
Put your faith in the personal liberty and the causes that forward that.
Pot/Kettle............
“I do not think you get that Picking out Pillsbury Dough Boy priorities and sending someone’s Son or Daughter to war is not the same thing.
Governors,especially ones that are close to an enemy such as Russia have that experience”
Palin sent other people’s sons and daughters to war?
I agree that it’s extremely unlikely that anything new would come out about Palin.
Yeah, if the time comes that all the candidates are beaten to a bloody pulp, Palin would look good.
I would think that she isn’t running, since she just said she wasn’t running.
For now, her supporters are half-heartedly seeking other candidates.
Palin is a good person, Perry is a bad person.
I believe HC is the only hope at this time, even though some of his supporters are really not in top notch playing condition. My big concern is that he is a stage 4 Liver Cancer survivor, but he has so many wonderful positives, and he will be a quick study on issues where he appears to be a lightweight.
I would have supported her ($$$) had she decided to run. However, I would not support her if she could somehow be talked into running after deciding not to. It doesn’t even sound right. I hope she gets behind Cain. I am.
If she has Presidential aspiration in the future it might not hurt her to get back into political office. Maybe a position in the Cain admin.
“Palin sent other people’s sons and daughters to war?
She couldn’t. Remember, she sold the Alaska state plane on eBay. :D”
Darn, that’s right. Too bad, too - or she could have piloted the plane, took out a few Iraqi nuclear installations on the way back, and been home in time to gut a moose with her teeth. :-)
“There is no record to vet. Only rhetoic.”
There are plenty of things to vet besides a political record and Palin is a prime example.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.