Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gone in 60 nanoseconds - ( Faster than light possible? )
WaPo ^ | October 6, 2011 | Charles Krauthammer

Posted on 10/07/2011 8:47:49 AM PDT by re_tail20

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan
"cosmology will be affected hugely. distances are measured/calculated assuming light speed is constant. And E=Mc^2 needs to be rethought/modified."

How is any of that brought into question? The experiment didn't show light going faster.

21 posted on 10/07/2011 10:08:27 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
"Even if faster than light travel is possible, this isn’t true. It’s hyperbole. Was everything we knew about the universe wrong when Newton was proved wrong? No. We still follow him, in the limited shpere where he applies (i.e. inbetween atoms and planets), like we’ve done since the 17th century."

Exactly. People like to talk about throwing out everything we know when there's some suprising develpment. It's nonsense.

"We’ve stuck with Einstein despite his system being overturned by quantum physics, which some people date to five years before his development of the Special Theory of Relativity."

A correction to this though. Quantum physics did not overturn relativity. Both theories have been tested to extreme degrees and both are accepted foundational theories of physics. They just don't have much overlap.

22 posted on 10/07/2011 10:13:11 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mlo
How is any of that brought into question? The experiment didn't show light going faster.

c being constant is now called into question.....c a constant and/or a speed limit is probably a localized or special phenomena by implication.

23 posted on 10/07/2011 10:41:13 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." Richard Feynman father of Quantum Physics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20
Gone in 60 nanoseconds - ( Faster than light possible? )

Gravity, though not waves in gravity, is faster than light. A device that detects the gravity of the sun will indicate a location in the sky where the sun actually is, rather than where it appears to be, which would not be the case if solar gravity were no speedier than the light coming from the sun.
24 posted on 10/07/2011 10:46:30 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20
Neutrinos fired

After they were fired, they showed up at "Occupy Wall Street" within 60 nanoseconds.

25 posted on 10/07/2011 11:53:28 AM PDT by Larry Lucido (I can only be series in a parallel universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20
The fundamental axiom of Einstein’s theory of relativity is the absolute prohibition on speed faster than light.

Not quite correct. The fundamental axiom of Einstein's theory is that the speed of light is the same for all observers, regardless of their velocity. The speed of light as a speed limit is a consequence of this constancy. Should this experiment with neutrinos turn out to be correct, we'd have to go back and examine whether different observers (moving at different velocities) measure different values for the speed of light.

26 posted on 10/07/2011 12:22:10 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney (New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. A primer on armed revolt. Available form Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20
...if that did happen on this Orient Express hurtling between Switzerland and Italy, then everything we know about the universe is wrong.

Stand by, film at 11:00...

Regards,
GtG

27 posted on 10/07/2011 1:32:03 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steveyp
The speed of light is inviolable. The science is settled. Deniers.

                    C

Not just a good idea, It's the law!

Regards,
GtG

28 posted on 10/07/2011 1:44:58 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]




Click the Pic               Thank you, JoeProBono

Follow the Exciting Adventures of Gary the Snail!

Abolish FReepathons
Go Monthly

Planning to donate $10 or more? You can sponsor
one or more New Monthly Donors for no additional cost
FReepmail TheOldLady

29 posted on 10/07/2011 2:32:23 PM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan
"c being constant is now called into question....."

It doesn't call C being a constant into question. It only suggests that some things that aren't light might exceed that constant. We don't actually know what the implications might be because nobody has worked out a theory yet that would explain these observations (and they probably won't because this won't hold up), but there's nothing about them that require doubting the constancy of the speed of light and there have been a great many other experiments that have already confirmed it.

30 posted on 10/08/2011 2:02:08 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
"Gravity, though not waves in gravity, is faster than light. A device that detects the gravity of the sun will indicate a location in the sky where the sun actually is, rather than where it appears to be, which would not be the case if solar gravity were no speedier than the light coming from the sun."

Gravity isn't instantaneous either.

31 posted on 10/08/2011 2:05:49 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mlo
Gravity isn't instantaneous either.

No, but some 25 times the speed of light is pretty stinking fast. For practical purposes, as far as satellites and space flight is concerned, though, gravity is treated as instantaneous.
32 posted on 10/08/2011 6:30:27 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson