Skip to comments.
Gone in 60 nanoseconds - ( Faster than light possible? )
WaPo ^
| October 6, 2011
| Charles Krauthammer
Posted on 10/07/2011 8:47:49 AM PDT by re_tail20
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan
"cosmology will be affected hugely. distances are measured/calculated assuming light speed is constant. And E=Mc^2 needs to be rethought/modified." How is any of that brought into question? The experiment didn't show light going faster.
21
posted on
10/07/2011 10:08:27 AM PDT
by
mlo
To: Tublecane
"Even if faster than light travel is possible, this isnt true. Its hyperbole. Was everything we knew about the universe wrong when Newton was proved wrong? No. We still follow him, in the limited shpere where he applies (i.e. inbetween atoms and planets), like weve done since the 17th century." Exactly. People like to talk about throwing out everything we know when there's some suprising develpment. It's nonsense.
"Weve stuck with Einstein despite his system being overturned by quantum physics, which some people date to five years before his development of the Special Theory of Relativity."
A correction to this though. Quantum physics did not overturn relativity. Both theories have been tested to extreme degrees and both are accepted foundational theories of physics. They just don't have much overlap.
22
posted on
10/07/2011 10:13:11 AM PDT
by
mlo
To: mlo
How is any of that brought into question? The experiment didn't show light going faster. c being constant is now called into question.....c a constant and/or a speed limit is probably a localized or special phenomena by implication.
23
posted on
10/07/2011 10:41:13 AM PDT
by
Donald Rumsfeld Fan
("Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." Richard Feynman father of Quantum Physics)
To: re_tail20
Gone in 60 nanoseconds - ( Faster than light possible? )
Gravity, though not waves in gravity, is faster than light. A device that detects the gravity of the sun will indicate a location in the sky where the sun actually is, rather than where it appears to be, which would not be the case if solar gravity were no speedier than the light coming from the sun.
24
posted on
10/07/2011 10:46:30 AM PDT
by
aruanan
To: re_tail20
Neutrinos fired After they were fired, they showed up at "Occupy Wall Street" within 60 nanoseconds.
25
posted on
10/07/2011 11:53:28 AM PDT
by
Larry Lucido
(I can only be series in a parallel universe.)
To: re_tail20
The fundamental axiom of Einsteins theory of relativity is the absolute prohibition on speed faster than light.Not quite correct. The fundamental axiom of Einstein's theory is that the speed of light is the same for all observers, regardless of their velocity. The speed of light as a speed limit is a consequence of this constancy. Should this experiment with neutrinos turn out to be correct, we'd have to go back and examine whether different observers (moving at different velocities) measure different values for the speed of light.
26
posted on
10/07/2011 12:22:10 PM PDT
by
JoeFromSidney
(New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. A primer on armed revolt. Available form Amazon.)
To: re_tail20
...if that did happen on this Orient Express hurtling between Switzerland and Italy, then everything we know about the universe is wrong. Stand by, film at 11:00...
Regards,
GtG
27
posted on
10/07/2011 1:32:03 PM PDT
by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
To: steveyp
The speed of light is inviolable. The science is settled. Deniers. C
Not just a good idea, It's the law!
Regards,
GtG
28
posted on
10/07/2011 1:44:58 PM PDT
by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
Click the Pic Thank you, JoeProBono
Follow the Exciting Adventures of Gary the Snail!
Abolish FReepathons
Go Monthly
Planning to donate $10 or more? You can sponsor
one or more New Monthly Donors for no additional cost
FReepmail TheOldLady
29
posted on
10/07/2011 2:32:23 PM PDT
by
TheOldLady
(FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan
"c being constant is now called into question....." It doesn't call C being a constant into question. It only suggests that some things that aren't light might exceed that constant. We don't actually know what the implications might be because nobody has worked out a theory yet that would explain these observations (and they probably won't because this won't hold up), but there's nothing about them that require doubting the constancy of the speed of light and there have been a great many other experiments that have already confirmed it.
30
posted on
10/08/2011 2:02:08 PM PDT
by
mlo
To: aruanan
"Gravity, though not waves in gravity, is faster than light. A device that detects the gravity of the sun will indicate a location in the sky where the sun actually is, rather than where it appears to be, which would not be the case if solar gravity were no speedier than the light coming from the sun." Gravity isn't instantaneous either.
31
posted on
10/08/2011 2:05:49 PM PDT
by
mlo
To: mlo
Gravity isn't instantaneous either.
No, but some 25 times the speed of light is pretty stinking fast. For practical purposes, as far as satellites and space flight is concerned, though, gravity is treated as instantaneous.
32
posted on
10/08/2011 6:30:27 PM PDT
by
aruanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson