I don't think so. Dr. Taitz kept getting thrown out for standing and they didn't even rule on her legal stuff. These people lost because their law stuff was all screwed up wrong. I bet that is why they discussed the Vattle Birther legal theories and then said they were wrong. I will double check with my BFF Fabia Sheen, Esq. tomorrow but she may not take the time to look at it because she thinks all this stuff is stupid. If you know a lawyer, you might want to ask them too.
OH Plus, I have been working on a easier to read version of Wong Kim Ark. It is like torture, but just putting the quotes in indents helps a lot.Here is a linky thingy:
This court is claiming there isn’t a case, that the claimant didn’t file anything for which they were entitled to a legal remedy. There was no ruling on “the legal stuff” because the court denied there even WAS any legal stuff. They said there was no case. Period. Everything else the court said was just bloviating about a case they had already said didn’t exist.