“screwed by a corrupt judge accepting a promotion from Obama in exchange for throwing a case through fraud”
Do you think it helps one’s case to be such a sore loser as to make up accusations against the Court?
Do you ever post on anything besides eligibility threads? Do you have a link to a comment you’ve (previously) made that’s harshly critical of Obama? If so, could you post the link. Thank you in advance.
Also, if it’s not too much trouble, could you point me to your most spirited defense or promotion of conservatism and/or most scathing indictment of liberalism? Thanks.
No sore loser. Gonzalez committed fraud by changing testimony of a witness.
Oh, geez. Have you looked at what Donofrio has shown on that judge? It’s blatant. It’s literally editing out the parts of a written statement that the judge didn’t want to see.
It’s even worse than the judge in the Strunk case, who ruled that it was a “reasonable search” for the Passport Office to search post-1978 records when looking for something older than 1967, or the judge who ruled that 20,000 didn’t meet the minimum requirement of $500, or the judge who ruled that ex parte twitters by total illiterates had already decided a legal case for him...
Shall I go on? How strong is your stomach to deal with the putrid stench coming out of the courts?