Who gets to say who's violent and crazy? Gun control is based on prior restraint ie punishing someone for soemthing the MIGHT do. The constitution doesn't make any distinction among individuals, saying some should have rights and some shouldn't. So until someone commits a crime, then yes they have the right to keep and bear arms, and anyone who wants to infringe those rights is by definition an anti-gunner. Regardless if they only want "reasonable restrictions" and they belong to the NRA or if they believe it's OK for states and localities to pass gun control.
Guessing from your response, you’ve been decided to be violent and crazy. Why would anyone support that unless they have been denied guns due to some mental disorder?
lol
What would you “might” have done had someone given you a gun?
So...are you saying some who have already committed crimes should not be allowed guns?
What about our 2nd amendment rights? You’re acting like those who have committed a crime should not be allowed guns, isn’t that your argument that if we didn’t allow guns that criminals would get them anyway???
Gotta choose one....can’t be on both sides of the coin.