This country has 50 million functional illiterates. These people should be reading books for fun. They cant do this; and what makes it so poignant is that they have no idea what was done to them or how to escape from the hit. Meanwhile, the experts who did it to them give each other awards, grants, professorships, and million-dollar publishing contracts. Crime does pay.
Some might call the Education Establishment a RICO enterprise. For ideological reasons, they decided they didnt want children to be individualistic or competitive. They wanted to make them all more or less the same. Our Education Establishment bought into leveling; and that meant a furtive undercutting of achievement, knowledge, and even reading. Kids who know too much will advance beyond the other kids and feel superior. You might think that reading is always a good thing; these progressive educators did not agree with you. A book published in 1958 mentions: Public school administrators have gone so far as to assert that they look hopefully for the day when learning to read will not be considered more important than learning to sew or skate."
I told you, this is a bad part of town. Quacks and swindlers lurk everywhere. Ah, look, there is New Math, which did for arithmetic what Look-say did for reading. The boys in the back room must have been proud. But this gimmick, which flourished for a few years around 1964, was so obviously unworkable (and vicious), that the whole country laughed it off the stage. Kids couldnt learn. Parents hated it. Teachers were bewildered. New Math vanished so quickly its easy to miss the main element of this story. Some of the smartest people in education (probably all with PhDs) spent 15 years preparing this con. They went too far. Point is, they tried. Museums should be built to New Math. It serves to remind everyone that the Education Establishment has a predilection for shady products that damage children.
New Math morphed some years later into Reform Math. Kids couldnt learn. Parents hated it. Teachers were bewildered. See a pattern?
There, in the shadows, more bad actors: Open Classroom, Life Adjustment,Self-Esteem, Multiculturalism, Relevance, No Memorization, Bilingual Education, the list goes on and on. Arguably, every method the top educators really love invariably turns out to be a Ponzi scheme.
The one thing these people are good at is marketing. Bad ideas with sweet-sounding names are forced into every classroom. Appreciate the genius in all these slick phrases: Constructivism, Cooperative Learning, Discovery Method, Whole Language, 21st-Century Skills, Common Core Standards, and many more. We dont know what they mean but they sure do sound good.
In a short space, I cant explain the inner machinery that renders each idea destructive. The important fact is that these gimmicks dont work very well (and are routinely replaced by other fads) but they are pushed for a time with brutal abandon. In all other parts of life, if bosses come up with stuff that doesnt work, they go out of business, they are fired, or voted out of office. But in education they are promoted. This is a gang or cult (more like a religion than most people realize). You cant be successful unless you embrace the creed that your mentors embraced. And in this way education is locked in dumb.
The media dont explain the cartels long and reckless history, and its far-left DNA. Typically, the explanations we see are shallow; and you may be left wondering why we have so many problems. So lets cut to the chase. The cheap and easy way to improve education is simply to root out the dishonest ideas that the top educators have pushed for the past century.
Almost every article written on education, for more than 60 years, mentions in passing that one-third of fourth graders cant read at grade level. One-third! So thats this years batch of functional illiterates that the schools are churning out. Theres no excuse. Really think about it, and youll be angry. Good, now we can start taking back the neighborhood.
-------------------------------------------------
This article was first published in VEER Magazine, Hampton Roads, Va. Bruce Price is an author, artist, and education activist. He founded Improve-Education.org in 2005. For related analysis, see 56: Top 10 Worst Ideas in Education on that site.
.
Thank you for posting your article in its entirety here. It was an interesting read. Good luck in your endeavors to improve education.
I learned to read on my own and by 5 I was proficient. My mother took me to the library and obtained a library card for me and after that I would walk the 3 blocks to the library and pick out my own books, often over the protest of the librarian that they were “too old” for me. The books used in school to teach us to read were the well known Dick and Jane books, with spot thrown in for good measure. Talk about boring to a kid already reading the science fiction of the 30s and 40s.
The author forgot Mainstreaming.
Let’s bring the classroom down to the level of the most profoundly disabled student. That way they’ll feel ‘accepted’.
Great idea!