Posted on 09/17/2011 10:49:16 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen
...
Immediately following it's FDA approval, Merck went on a nationwide campaign to make the vaccine mandatory, actively urging legislatures in all 50 states to pass laws requiring all school aged girls to be treated with the drug. Following heaving criticism from the media and other organizations, Merck dropped the push for state mandates in February 2006, instead concentrating on major ad campaigns urging the general female population to obtain the vaccine in order to prevent cervical cancer. Texas was the only state to pass laws mandating the vaccine before Merck withdrew it's efforts.
...
Under the federal law passed in the late 1980s, victims of vaccines may file a claim under the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, but cannot sue the pharmaceutical company. Last year, the government added HPV to a list of vaccines, including polio, hepatitis and measles, granted immunity from suit. A New York Post analysis of adverse event reports filed through April 30 of 2008 found that about 20 percent of such reports followed injections of Gardasil.
If victims prove a vaccine likely caused injuries, the program pays a maximum $250,000 for death. The average payment for injury has been $1 million.
...
Dr. John Iskander, the CDC's acting director for immunization safety, says that the CDC has investigated 10 of the reported deaths and has found no conclusive evidence linking the vaccine. He went on to state that "although it is sad that young, healthy young women die for no apparent reason" there was no conclusive evidence that Gardasil had created the adverse reactions experienced by the dead women, or those suffering from seizures, paralysis and brain damage. The only common side effect of the vaccine, according Dr. Iskander, is fainting.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at digitaljournal.com ...
You finally told some!
Not impressed.
They look good on her website, but they went nowhere.
WOW!! Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act!!!
Did you post this to impress anyone in particular! i notice at least two were in 2011....just in time for the old campaign!!!
Introduced Apr 8, 2011
Introduced Mar 31, 2011
Introduced Mar 31, 2011
Introduced Mar 1, 2011
Introduced Jan 5, 2011
Introduced Jan 5, 2011
These are the dates of all her bills being introduced...Hmm started on Jan. 5th 2011...I wonder what was about to happen...couldn’t be a certain campaign could it!!!
You did catch the word “recent” didn’t you? perhaps not
Those were her recent bills.
Please point out where I didn’t tell the truth?
Well you asked for a list of what she’s done and those were her recent bills.
Whats Perry done? Except help illegals, force drugs on little kids and resist conservative efforts.
If you click on all you get the same list!!!
Stupid is as stupid does. If you can’t make the effort to look then you are hardly a person anyone should listen to.
Appointed CONSERVATIVE JUDGES.
By LAW Balanced the State budget for 10 years. Making hard decisions BTW.
Took on the Lawyers that most Law makers genuflect to.
Prevented billions of $$$ going to Lefty Lawyers that was to help people with tobacco related illnesses.
FACE it she doesn’t have even 1/3rd of Perry’s experience.
gave taxpayer funded educations to illegal immigrants
don’t forget that one
That’s a lie...Perry doesn’[t
support illegal immigration.” You mislead intentionally.
see #72
He supports illegals, he helps them get educations so they can take the jobs of Americans.
When challenged he throws the race card out like a good liberal schmuck
pretty simple
you are the liar
you lie!
Why else would he support using tax dollars to help illegals get an education? Why
Ahhh so you prefer the career politician experience that Perry brings to the table. Including the time he spent as a Democrat and his current RINO behavior.
I’d prefer a conservative who supports the Constitution and that certainly isn’t Perry.
hows that for an argument, pretty good I’d say considering what the campaigns are doing match this
Because thats what the voters want.
I haven’t partaken in these threads but it is important to
Know that the multitude of vaccines now given to tiny newborns in the first 6 months of
Life is highly dangerous. If you aren’t putting your child into a huge group daycare there is no reason to assault your child’s neurological health like this.
Check out what happens to many of us who blindly follow the pediatricians’ recommendations: http://www.vaccineinjury.info/vaccine-damage-reports-2010.html
And realise that most parents whose child reacted thusly never reported it. I didn’t, even though I could have and my firstborn does have autism.
I do think Bachmann has not handled this well, but neither did perry by falling for the fake urgency for this vaccine. But politics aside, vAccines, with their partial immunity and all the negative side effects of the metals, neuro-adjuvants, and contMinated media, are not worth the risk for infants. Not a one should be given before age 2.
If she gets nominated I will be glad to vote for her....but at the moment she is dropping like a rock and shooting herself in the foot. She made a good argument against Perry in the debate and then blew it within in a hour after the debate by exaggerating the effects of the drug. I’m not a big supporter of Perry but he’s hitting a lot of buttons that people agree with but he also has some warts. Some of us can move past those warts some can’t!! I sat out the last election I don’t think we have the luxury of giving Zero four more years because we don’t have the perfect candidate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.