Skip to comments.
Judge rules on Obama's Social Security Number [Tells attorney: 'Today is not your lucky day']
WND ^
| August 30, 2011
| Bob Unruh
Posted on 08/30/2011 4:32:16 PM PDT by RobinMasters
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-153 next last
To: RobinMasters
well, when those charged with responsibility of dispensing blind justice start making cute remarks like that, it’s time to impeach/remove/replace them.
To: RobinMasters
Back to filling people’s teeth for Orly
3
posted on
08/30/2011 4:36:31 PM PDT
by
woofie
To: RobinMasters
the judge decided there was no real interest in determining whether or not a crime has been committed??
WTF?
seriously... so judges that don’t like a case can now make an unsubstantiated claim and dismiss a case brought before them? this guy needs to be tossed off the bench immediately
obviously the people bringing the case cared... but I guess that no longer matters
lawlessness... pure and simple
4
posted on
08/30/2011 4:37:17 PM PDT
by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
To: RobinMasters
5
posted on
08/30/2011 4:37:29 PM PDT
by
Jonty30
To: RobinMasters
the plaintiff had identified no public interest that would be served by disclosure."Wrong!
6
posted on
08/30/2011 4:37:31 PM PDT
by
Jane Long
(2 Chron 7:14)
To: RobinMasters
I hope someone is keeping track of all these judges with no balls to do their job.
7
posted on
08/30/2011 4:39:19 PM PDT
by
Safrguns
To: sten
who is protecting this guy?
To: television is just wrong
9
posted on
08/30/2011 4:42:14 PM PDT
by
Mmogamer
(I refudiate the lamestream media, leftists and their prevaricutions.)
To: Jane Long
She won’t give up, good for her!
10
posted on
08/30/2011 4:44:25 PM PDT
by
freebird5850
(Of course Obama loves his country...it's just that Sarah Palin loves mine!)
To: LucyT
11
posted on
08/30/2011 4:44:32 PM PDT
by
Spunky
(“Never interupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.” Napolean)
To: Seizethecarp; rxsid
12
posted on
08/30/2011 4:46:13 PM PDT
by
circumbendibus
(Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2011)
To: circumbendibus
these judges have no respect for her, she needs to get someone else to back her.
To: RobinMasters
is there some reason she doesn't file in a less bias jurisdiction???
14
posted on
08/30/2011 4:48:12 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: RobinMasters
“He concluded that there’s no real interest in determining whether the Obama Social Security Number is genuine or fraudulent, and the need for secrecy for the president trumps all else.”
It’s been “twittered.”
Badges? We don’t need no stinkin’ badges.
To: RobinMasters
This ruling is totally insane. Obama has congress and judges wrapped around his fraudent finger. Truly stunning beyond words.
16
posted on
08/30/2011 4:48:51 PM PDT
by
SouthDixie
(The secret to staying young is to live honestly, eat slowly and lie about your age.)
To: RobinMasters
Of course not. The judge is in obama’s pocket just like everyone else.
To: RobinMasters
Royce Lamberth used to be a publicity hound during the Clinton years, often making provocative statements but never amounting to anything. Sounds like he hasn't changed.
To: freebird5850
She’s got ‘em. The judges don’t.
19
posted on
08/30/2011 4:50:34 PM PDT
by
ladyjane
To: RobinMasters
0bama’s guilty, or the judge wouldn’t have arrived at that decision.
20
posted on
08/30/2011 4:52:33 PM PDT
by
FrdmLvr
(culture, language, borders)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-153 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson