Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All; y'all; et al

This hypothesis seems to be the starting point of this theory:

The problem of “nonradiative” release of nuclear fusion energy

As we have already noted, the virtual absence of conventional nuclear decay products of the compound nucleus was widely regarded as one of the paradoxes of DD fusion with the formation of 4He in the experiments [2]. We proposed the explanation of this paradox in [4]. We believe that after penetration through the Coulomb barrier at low energies and the materialization of the two deuterons in a potential well, these deuterons retain their identity for some time. This time defines the frequency of further nuclear reactions.


3 posted on 08/20/2011 11:42:03 AM PDT by Kevmo (Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo

Until we have a good theory, it does not at all surprise me that experiments seems to be not repeatable.

Even something as the temperatures that a metal is forged in and allowed to cool might be enough to make or break the ability for the reactions to occur.

But I have little doubt now - very little, in fact, - that something is going on.

Pons and Fleischman may not have been the greatest theoretical nuclear physicists, but they were thermodynamic chemists par excellence!


4 posted on 08/20/2011 11:50:08 AM PDT by djf (One of the few FReepers who NEVER clicked the "dead weasel" thread!! But may not last much longer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson