“I will stuff nothing. fr is the place for answers to questions.”
Then ask a question that’s worthy of an answer. Your *question* wasn’t a question just because it had a question mark after it. It was a snide, rude remark, a gratuitous slap at something you took completely out of context.
“Your stupid comment does nothing to move the conversation forward”
If my comment was so stupid, why did you feel the irresistable need to reply to it? I should think that someone of your superior intellect would simply bypass stupid...unless your intention from your first post on was to disrupt and pick silly arguments for no reason at all other than you could. It really didn’t occur to me that you were in any way trying to have a conversation, let alone move it forward. Hence the reply.
“and its more worthy for a place like the democratic underground.”
Why do the most disruptive and ignorant posters use du as a shield? As long as I have been here, I have never once said such a thing to anyone, even to some of the more nasty posts I have read on many, many threads. Seems to me accusing someone of being better suited to du is the default position of those who actually use du tactics to attack other Freepers...for no reason except to elicit a like response.
Sorry to disappoint you. .
This is what they mean when they say, "If you want to piss off a liberal, tell him the truth."
Outstanding reply. Say no more.
;^\