Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Paedophilia is Hollywood's biggest problem,' explosive claim by former child star Corey Feldman
dailymail.co.uk ^ | aug 12, 2011 | Daily Mail Reporter

Posted on 08/12/2011 8:08:36 PM PDT by ransomnote

Actor Corey Feldman has sensationally claimed that his Lost Boys co-star Corey Haim was the victim of a paedophile who was also a Hollywood mogul.

The Lost Boys actor said he was 'literally surrounded' by paedophiles at the age of 14, but didn't realise 'until I was much older what they were and what they wanted.'

In a special report, 'Underage And Famous' for ABC's Nightline show, Feldman blamed former co-star Corey Haim's death at the age 38 on the abuse he suffered at the hands of a 'Hollywood mogul' he refused to name.

The 40-year-old former child star said that paedophiles were 'like vultures' in the entertainment industry and alleged that the 'casting couch' even applies to children.

SNIP

He told Nightline: 'The number one problem in Hollywood was, is and always will be paedophilia," he said. 'It's all done under the radar... But it's the big secret.'

'There was a circle of older men that surrounded themselves around this group of kids. And they they had power or connections to great power in the industry.

'I was surrounded by them when I was 14 and I didnt even know it. It was only when I was old enough to know what they were.

'They all had either their own power, or connections to great power in the entertainment industry.' In 2008, the pair who confronted each other on their reality show, The Two Coreys. Haim said to Feldman: 'You let me get f***** around in my life, raped, when I was about 14 and a half.

'So I'm asking you, what did you do when you saw that s*** going down?'

To which Feldman responded: 'I was being molested at the same time... what did you do about it?'

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: acertainface; acertainsmile; amyberg; anopensecret; barryonthelowdown; bryansinger; coreyfeldman; coreyhaim; davidneuman; fernandorivas; garthancier; garygoddard; hollywood; homosexualagenda; jasonjamesmurphy; martinweiss; michaelegan; moralabsolutes; pedophiles; pedophilia; thecoreys
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
If true, then pedophilia is more mainstream in Hollyweird than I realized. I had heard of rampant promiscuity and drugs etc. and exploitation of young girls but hadn't heard that young males were being preyed upon by staff and 'moguls' to this degree.
1 posted on 08/12/2011 8:08:41 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Judging from the depraved garbage produced by Hollywood, can’t say I’m surprised.


2 posted on 08/12/2011 8:12:18 PM PDT by surroundedbyblue (Live the message of Fatima - pray & do penance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Will the media be as fervent advocates in rooting out such abusers in Hollywood as they did with the Catholic Church and other religious organizations? Probably not, and that’s a travesty.


3 posted on 08/12/2011 8:12:30 PM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Legitimizing pedophilia is the radical Left’s next social-engineering goal.


4 posted on 08/12/2011 8:12:48 PM PDT by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
I am skeptical. If it were true and he was truly outraged, there would be some names attached to the accusations. That's just the opinion of someone far distanced from Hollywierd.
5 posted on 08/12/2011 8:12:58 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Why would anyone be surprised by this?

Hollyuweird has been pushing child sex to the point of making NAMBLA blush.


6 posted on 08/12/2011 8:14:11 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Why would anyone be surprised by this?

Hollyuweird has been pushing child sex to the point of making NAMBLA blush.


7 posted on 08/12/2011 8:14:11 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

What is truly SAD is this doesn’t surprise me in the least. No shock here. I remember reading an article about Shirley Temple and some movie guy put the moves on her when she was just a child. If memory serves me right, she kicked him in his shin. I think this kind of depravity has been going on and will continue for a long time.


8 posted on 08/12/2011 8:14:29 PM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I’m not surprised.

Look at all the weird script writing they do when they have kids in the movie. They seem to always have kids referring to sex somehow or cursing.

I’m still the only one I know who hates the movie ET because of one of the first lines said by a kid, which was utterly filthy.


9 posted on 08/12/2011 8:18:24 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shadow44

Ah I think the worship of Polanski answers that question...


10 posted on 08/12/2011 8:18:51 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: momtothree

Shirley Temple said that she laughed when the perv exposed himself to her. The kick must have come after that.


11 posted on 08/12/2011 8:19:21 PM PDT by LottieDah (If only those who speak so eloquently on behalf of animals would do so on behalf of the unborn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

[ I’m not surprised.

Look at all the weird script writing they do when they have kids in the movie. They seem to always have kids referring to sex somehow or cursing.

I’m still the only one I know who hates the movie ET because of one of the first lines said by a kid, which was utterly filthy. ]

It is the practice of “Corrupting the Youth” and it is a kink of these sickos.


12 posted on 08/12/2011 8:22:34 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Corey should name names if he is serious about changing things out there in LaLaLand.


13 posted on 08/12/2011 8:23:04 PM PDT by Palladin (Sarah Palin in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LottieDah

Poor Shirley!! I always loved her movies and would belt out “Animal Crackers” when I was a kid.


14 posted on 08/12/2011 8:25:43 PM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

[ Legitimizing pedophilia is the radical Left’s next social-engineering goal. ]

Since their parenting ideas is that kids are nothing more than “little adults” and should be treated like “little kings and queens” is it any wonder that they are pursing this?

Treating kids like “little adults” has ruined a LOT of children so far, treating like “little adults” ion terms of sexuality will further erode the stability of civilization.


15 posted on 08/12/2011 8:25:47 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

I know Hollywood is perverse but I didn’t really see the predation on boys as much as I could perceive the warping attitudes toward prepubescent girls. Porn type movies with little girls wearing make up or the Jon Bennett pushing of little girls to be sex objects by dirty old men, yes. But there isn’t the same method of portraying a 14 year old boy as a ‘man’ the way there is slapping loud makeup and heels on a little girl. Although Blue Lagoon and Name of the Rose exploit boys - it’s on film and not a boy being ‘surrounded’ by paid Hollyweird pedophile staff and ‘moguls’. Neither male or female children look adult in films but one is dressed up and presented for warping fantasy where the boys seem like they are ‘cosmetically’ left alone. The mental image I had was soddom and gomorrah for adults and some young girls whose mothers don’t care about them - not movie moguls preying on 14 year old boys. *sigh* I THOUGHT I was cynical enough...


16 posted on 08/12/2011 8:26:31 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

Just watch some TV and you’ll understand


17 posted on 08/12/2011 8:29:36 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Billy Ray Cyrus allowed his 15 year old daughter to take off her shirt for a Vanity Fair photographer. Meanwhile he lets his 9 year old model lingerie.


18 posted on 08/12/2011 8:31:01 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9
I’m still the only one I know who hates the movie ET because of one of the first lines said by a kid, which was utterly filthy.

I detest -- and immediately will stop watching -- all movies that depict children using profane language.

Often, as I've discovered, these are PG-rated movies too.

The race to the bottom continues apace.

19 posted on 08/12/2011 8:31:03 PM PDT by Flycatcher (God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

There was something advertised on Hulu - I didn’t bother to find out because, based on the trailer, it’s not something I would watch.

The children make a breakfast tray for mom and dad. They are seen outside the door excited and braced to rush in. The jump into the room swinging the door wide and the parents are shown in the middle of sex. The children run screaming out of the room as the parents dash to cover themselves. Seems like a pointless ruining of an innocent moment (the Hallmark card type ‘We made breakfast for you Mommy’) in the lives of children for the purpose of sexual titillation. I say ‘pointless ruining’ because I believe the clip was meant to be seen by children as well as adults - gotta get those viewers you know!


20 posted on 08/12/2011 8:32:17 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson