Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I Am Now Starting To Feel Good About Barack Obama's Presidency
8/10/11 | me

Posted on 08/10/2011 11:11:20 AM PDT by Why So Serious

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Retired Greyhound
Hey, I remember when Reagan was elected, it was my first vote.

No one knew how good he was going to be back then, we just knew we had to get rid of Carter.

No one knows who is going to win the GOP nomination, nor do they really know how good they will be if elected.

We do know we have to get rid of the current fraud.

21 posted on 08/10/2011 11:49:56 AM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Why So Serious

What better way to have it screamed to the world “LIBERALISM SUCKS!”


22 posted on 08/10/2011 11:59:50 AM PDT by MNDude (so that's what they meant by Carter's second term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Priority #1 is to get rid of Obama.

But most Reagan supporters knew he was special.


23 posted on 08/10/2011 12:01:54 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound
I'm sorry, no one knew how good he was going to be. We all hoped he would be good, but it played out in real time, in a real historical series of moments.

No one (including you) knows how this is going to play out. No one knows who is going to be our nominee, nor do we know if they win what will happen.

Color me skeptical that you knew, and that you know our nominee can't be great this time around.

One thing we know, is that my dog would be a better president than the current fraud (and I don't own a dog)...........

24 posted on 08/10/2011 12:15:45 PM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Why So Serious
Ronald Reagan may well have been the greatest president of the last century. He raised FICA taxes, passed amnesty for millions of illegals, sold weapons to Islamic radicals and ran the largest deficits ever up to that point.

I say this not to belittle Ronaldus Magnus, but as a warning. Our country is much more dependent, lazy, Godless and ignorant than they were in 1980. Our debts are greater, our bureaucracy more bloated, our financial systems more corrupted and our enemies less rational. To save this country the next president will need to dwarf the accomplishments of Ronald Reagan and they will need an equally conservative and motivated congress to accomplish it.

The electorate in the next cycle may well vote in large numbers of new Republican office holders, and for that you can in some twisted way thank Barack Obama. But until the Republicans get the courage to talk about eliminating - not adjusting, not tweaking, not refinancing - the massive entitlements that will soon bury us then it is all theater for the masses.

I don't feel good about the future because political victories without substantive legislative ones are meaningless.

25 posted on 08/10/2011 12:24:05 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: geologist
Father open the hearts and eyes of those that do not know thee, bring them into the fold according to thy will. May your will be done on earth as it is in heaven Forgive us our sins, in Jesus name and for his sake. Amen.

That's the SECOND good prayer I've read from you today. I join you and say, AMEN!

26 posted on 08/10/2011 12:31:30 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Why So Serious
Why So Serious, Why So Serious?
27 posted on 08/10/2011 12:34:11 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Why So Serious
Why So Serious, Why So Serious?
28 posted on 08/10/2011 12:34:16 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Why So Serious
I agree with the authors premise. Too many Americans are disconnected from Washington politics and pay little attention to what happens in congress, thinking that it doesn't affect them and/or they can't do anything about whatever it is that they may not approve of being done by politicians. The election of Barack Hussein Obama , a man with no real record of accomplishment and very dubious associations was elected on a smile, a slogan, white guilt and massive media hype and adoration, not necessarily in that order. Average Americans felt good about helping elect the 'first Black man' to the presidency. I heard many of my more apolitical friends say as much. Few looked too hard at Obama's credentials or his lack of a real record. He looked good in a suit, spoke well and made white folks feel reassured that he was going to do a fine job. Hope and Change! Great slogan. Meanwhile, the Republican, John McCain, looked old and tired, ran a lackluster campaign and practically conceded the election long before the actual vote. Only the addition of Alaska governor Sarah Palin added any interest in his campaign. Alas, it wasn't enough. Obama was elected, handily, in November, 2008.

Flash forward almost 3 years. The U.S. economy is crashing around our collective ears and Obama points fingers, makes the same speech every few days and the media desperately tries to blame the TEA party for everything that's going wrong - but few are buying it. Harry Truman, for all his faults (mostly forgotten, now) realized that, indeed, 'The Buck Stops Here' - with the president. Not a grass roots movement (the TEA party) or even congress, but with the President of the United States. Like it or not and deny it as he will, Barack Obama (and the Democrats) own the failing U.S. economy. Blaming George W. Bush or the TEA party won't work anymore. Americans are hurting financially and growing angry at Obama, not the TEA party. As always, the president is the focal point for citizen anger when things go terribly wrong. Many Americans may not think or care whether Barack Obama is a communist, socialist or a vegetarian but they will blame him for the economic mess the country is in. Americans work hard and just want a decent life. A bad economy makes that goal harder and harder to reach and no one likes that. The leftmedia, reliably pro-Obama/Democrat are also being abandoned by more and more Americans. Fox News, long a target for left-wing hatred, is booming. FNC blows away the competition on every level. A sure sign that America is moving to the right. Perhaps not really 'conservative', as we conservatives might define the label, but definitely away from Obama and liberalism, which has demonstrably failed.

Which brings us full circle to the validation of the premise that a hard-left president with a complicit media and, for two years, Democrat control of the congress, by the abject failure of his policies has awakened apathetic Americans and is turning them against both liberal politics and Barack Obama, his false hope and his change - for the worse. In a perverse way, the Obama presidency has actually done something good for America by showing the country the inevitable result of socialism, and it isn't pretty.

29 posted on 08/10/2011 12:37:19 PM PDT by Jim Scott ( "Game On!" - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Why So Serious

I felt the same way in 1979 as Jimmy Carter faltered and the country’s economic problems opened the way to Ronald Reagan’s election. The 2012 election seems poised to be a potential realignment election in which the Democratic party suffers and even more severe loss than it did in 1980.


30 posted on 08/10/2011 12:42:26 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Why So Serious

Freepers, are you like me?

Here’s how I proceeded thru this thread:

1) Saw title in latest comment activity.
2) Thought, ‘probably should be a BARF alert on this’
3) Clicked the link
4) Observed it was a vanity, as there was no published URL link
5) Started to read the first couple lines
6) Read: “I got involved with politics when Ronald Reagan was election President”
7) Thought, “was ELECTION President? That doesn’t even make sense.”
8) Hovered over the sign up date of the poster
9) Saw December, 2010.
10) Started checking for IBTZ posts below
11) Never read any more of the post.
12) Penned this POST REPLY.

Is that what anyone else did?


31 posted on 08/10/2011 12:44:57 PM PDT by GreenAccord (Bacon Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

Carter faced a tough fight from The Swimmer for the nomination, I think if Carter ran opposed for the nomination, he might very well have won.

That’s the one good thing The Swimmer did, was to help take Carter down.


32 posted on 08/10/2011 12:45:14 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
that should read " I think if Carter ran unopposed for the nomination, he might very well have won.
33 posted on 08/10/2011 12:46:05 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Don’t confuse the poster...........


34 posted on 08/10/2011 12:56:19 PM PDT by Osage Orange (HE HATE ME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]



Boop His Beak!

Let Free Republic fly like an eagle

Donate, monthly if possible
A Sponsor will contribute $10 for each New Monthly Donor

35 posted on 08/10/2011 1:00:57 PM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Why So Serious

36 posted on 08/10/2011 1:08:29 PM PDT by TheCause ("that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

This is liberalism run amock. In fact, it is just plain Marxism, Socialism, Communism. Calling a spade a spade is okay. (Oops! I’ll be accused of “racism” I suspect. I’m sick of this PC crap! - And, I’m feeling GAY today, too! I’m reclaiming that word from the “definition changers”.)


37 posted on 08/10/2011 1:10:09 PM PDT by Twinkie (You can't spend your way out of debt !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GreenAccord; Old Teufel Hunden; Osage Orange
In addition to the OP's age discrepancy - pointed out already, the following quote just doesn't sound right:

I became a Republican Precinct captain that year and mom, dad, and I were the only Republicans in the whole precinct.

That's just not credible.

38 posted on 08/10/2011 1:19:53 PM PDT by floozy22 (The Palin Brand 2012: For Such A Time As This)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Why So Serious

A lot of us are surprised it didn’t happen sooner.


39 posted on 08/10/2011 1:30:39 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Arguably, Kennedy’s challenge diminished Carter’s stature and his hold on the affections of the Democratic Party. Yet those effects ought not to be given too much weight as Kennedy’s challenge does not seem to have shifted any elements of the electorate from Carter to Reagan.


40 posted on 08/10/2011 3:03:41 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson