Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; AFreeBird; Airwinger; Aliska; altair; ...
AT&T to start "Throttling" heavy users of their "unlimited" Wireless plans —PING!


AT&T's unlimited plans not quite unlimited... at least in speed Ping!

Please, No Flame Wars!
Discuss technical issues, software, and hardware.
Don't attack people!
Don't respond to the Anti-Apple Thread Trolls!
PLEASE IGNORE THEM!!!

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.

2 posted on 07/29/2011 6:11:02 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft product "insult" free zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker

This seems quite reasonable, and therefore people will complain a lot about it.


9 posted on 07/29/2011 6:29:37 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

This is a fairly sane approach to dealing with bandwidth hogs. Personally, I’d prefer a scaling approach: the more bandwidth you use, the lower priority your packets get. At slack times, you can have full speed whereas during the busiest times, the people with more acute needs get preference.


57 posted on 07/30/2011 4:00:36 AM PDT by kevkrom (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Some use around 10GB per _week_. Or more.

There’s a social understanding that you don’t abuse “all you can eat” buffets. People who justify such abuse are twits.


70 posted on 07/31/2011 4:28:08 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson