To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; AFreeBird; Airwinger; Aliska; altair; ...
AT&T to start "Throttling" heavy users of their "unlimited" Wireless plans PING!

AT&T's unlimited plans not quite unlimited... at least in speed Ping!
Please, No Flame Wars!
Discuss technical issues, software, and hardware.
Don't attack people!
Don't respond to the Anti-Apple Thread Trolls!
PLEASE IGNORE THEM!!!
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
2 posted on
07/29/2011 6:11:02 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft product "insult" free zone.)
To: Swordmaker
This seems quite reasonable, and therefore people will complain a lot about it.
To: Swordmaker
This is a fairly sane approach to dealing with bandwidth hogs. Personally, I’d prefer a scaling approach: the more bandwidth you use, the lower priority your packets get. At slack times, you can have full speed whereas during the busiest times, the people with more acute needs get preference.
57 posted on
07/30/2011 4:00:36 AM PDT by
kevkrom
(This space for rent.)
To: Swordmaker
Some use around 10GB per _week_. Or more.
There’s a social understanding that you don’t abuse “all you can eat” buffets. People who justify such abuse are twits.
70 posted on
07/31/2011 4:28:08 AM PDT by
ctdonath2
($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson