You didn’t read for comprehension anything that I posted to you.
You simply want to argue.
You are wrong on every count, so I will bid you good evening.
>>You didnt read for comprehension anything that I posted to you.<<
That is such an insipid response. I ask what you specifically object to and you petulantly say “well, read my post again!”
Your post makes no sense. If you want to say I didn’t comprehend your post (which I didn’t), then it is 51% on me and 51% on you.
I ask again: what SPECIFICALLY do you disagree with me on? At this point I have 3 issues:
1) SS was a dumb idea
2) People who depend on SS are dumb
3) SS should be killed asap (phased out to be fair to the dumb people in 2) ) - we should walk away from the money stolen to date so long as the stealing stops.
There. Now, which of these do you disagree with?
Or you just going to throw another tantrum and refuse to make yourself clear?