Posted on 07/24/2011 5:56:43 PM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
Edited on 07/24/2011 7:15:42 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Alan Simpson, Senator from Wyoming , Co-Chair of Obama's deficit commission, calls senior citizens the Greediest Generation as he compared "Social Security" to a Milk Cow with 310 million teats.
Here's a response in a letter from a unknown farmer in Montana .... I think he is a little ticked off! He also tells it like it is ! --------------------------------------------------------- "Hey Alan, let's get a few things straight..
Spit it out in whatever language you are most comfortable with.
You make no sense, you aren’t asking a question, you are posting gibberish.
Just go away.
And I repeat my suggestion you step away from the bong.
4 words — good to see some progress. Still no context, no meaning, no question.
Good dope, eh?
Click the link under the headline that says “[history]”...
Edited
Reason: profanity
You made a statement in #26 and I ask you to explain it. Now you try to reduce me to bong-hitting pothead. BTW Rachel Maddow is still undetermined you flake.
There you go again, trying to personalize a discussion when nobody gives a flip about your stupid retirement plans, or mine, and you making all kinds of stupid irrelevant assumptions, when what you “gather” is completely wrong and irrelevant. What you don’t quite get is that SS (and Medicare) are politically popular prgrams that the majority of voters do want to see continue, whether they benefit by not having to worry about their parents medical and daily needs and independence, or by knowing there is a last-resort for them if their 401k does disappear so they don’t wind up eating dog-food like you probably do out of ignorance. It is you who is on the wrong board because you don’t have the sense to be able to discuss what is simple political reality, thinking it’s genius to cite the 80 year old origin of the program-in-question, without resorting to name-calling, which is what you started out doing in your first post.
Your still an idiot. Get back to the question.
>>Your still an idiot. Get back to the question.<<
Don’t you mean “you am idiot?” And there is no question posed.
>>You made a statement in #26 and I ask you to explain it.<<
You have made no such request. Or if you did, it was so nonsensical as to be unanswerable.
Re-ask in English and I will attempt to answer.
Reply to the question posed. It is available for all to see. Ad-Hominem attacks are not needed now.
I’ll let FReeperdom rule on this. You have no ability to back your own statements. I understand Oregon may have an opening soon. Check it out.
>>here you go again, trying to personalize a discussion when nobody gives a flip about your stupid retirement plans, or mine, and you making all kinds of stupid irrelevant assumptions, when what you “gather” is completely wrong and irrelevant. <<
OK, although fun, that is a content-neutral statement. (btw: PPHs are our friends)
>>What you don’t quite get is that SS (and Medicare) are politically popular prgrams that the majority of voters do want to see continue, whether they benefit by not having to worry about their parents medical and daily needs and independence, or by knowing there is a last-resort for them if their 401k does disappear so they don’t wind up eating dog-food like you probably do out of ignorance. <<
So, you think it is better for your parents to eat dog food than support them as a good child should. The bigger the government, the less family responsibility is needed. Next up: let them die in he summer heat while we take vacation like the French did a few years ago.
Not that I don’t think we should not give the people who paid in back their money — read my post. Give it back, end the program, be done with it.
You sure sound like a New deal supporter who thinks SS is a good idea. Well, at least we know where you stand.
>>It is you who is on the wrong board because you don’t have the sense to be able to discuss what is simple political reality, thinking it’s genius to cite the 80 year old origin of the program-in-question, without resorting to name-calling, which is what you started out doing in your first post.<<
I use the term “stupid” in terms of “not intelligent.” banking on SS is Not Intelligent. SS, in general was stupid, dependence on it IS stupid (um, I mean Not Intelligent), continuing it is IDIOCY, bordering on madness.
And it was you who tried to use my 401(k) strategy and issue against me — so you can discard it, but I discard it from the discussion as well.
>>Reply to the question posed. It is available for all to see. Ad-Hominem attacks are not needed now.<<
Which post?
When someone posts gibberish, it isn’t Ad Hominem to suggest they cease using mind altering drugs.
>>I’ll let FReeperdom rule on this. You have no ability to back your own statements. I understand Oregon may have an opening soon. Check it out.<<
Seriously - you are making a fool of yourself. I suggest you stop now.
If you have a question ask it — if not, then quit being so coy. If I missed it then you can nya nya me when you re-post the entire question.
If not, then all FReeperdom can tell you are just higher than a kite.
If you do not wish to defend the crap you post, just say so. I take offense to anybody that blames me for this mess. Your post #26 does just that. You don’t know my life, trials, or tribulations. I do not need a punk telling me their opinion based on a bunch of socialist teachers.
I would guess your “back-button” is a little different than most.
>>If you do not wish to defend the crap you post, just say so. I take offense to anybody that blames me for this mess. Your post #26 does just that. You don’t know my life, trials, or tribulations. I do not need a punk telling me their opinion based on a bunch of socialist teachers.<<
So you don’t actually HAVE a question. You never did. You have been exposed as a fraud and a probable troll.
And that I am *against* SS (and just want the funds returned to those who had it taken from them) and you are *for* it makes ME a socialist??? LOL — to paraphrase you: I leave that for FReepers to decide.
Got New Deal, Comradeski?
SS, what is that?
>>I would guess your “back-button” is a little different than most.<<
I guess it does. Ask your question, O Bong-master.
Or admit you never asked one and it is YOUR back-button that is failing.
1) I ask you for the post where you asked a question: you refer to MY post
2) I ask for the entire question, you refer to 1)
You are so busted, it isn’t even funny. You have gone beyond amusing to just pedantic and boring.
Repeating non-answers isn’t cute — it is just annoying.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.