Is this too simple for everyone to understand, including the Trump?
(1) The White House DID NOT receive a “certified copy” of an original birth certificate from Hawaii.
(2)The White House received a newly created digital ABSTRACT of data on file in Hawaii.
(3)The White House then made various “copies” of this ABSTRACT.
(4) The White House then released “copies” to the media, allowing them and everyone else, to assume that this was a a “copy” of the birth certificate on file in Hawaii.
(5) It is not a “certified copy” of a birth certificate. It is a “copy” of an ABSTRACT. If anyone in the MSM needs to (or cares to) learn the difference between an ABSTRACT and a Certified Copy, ask a Real Estate Broker, or Title Officer, maybe even a Used Car Dealer.
The scam the Magic Marxist pulled ain’t exactly rocket surgery. Besides, whatever happened tio the “Natural Born Citizen” issue? Will Donofrio or somebody else renew his efforts to establish the chimp’s ineligibility in 2012?
In Hawaii they consider issuing certified short form COLBs to be “abstracts” and long form Certificates of Live Birth to be issuing “copies.”
Here’s what the Hawaii Director of Health said about the long form. Note the word “copy.” They say that they issued two “certified copies.”
http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/News_Release_Birth_Certificate_042711.pdf
The registrar of vital statistics’ stamp says: “I certify this is a true copy OR abstract of the record on file at the Hawaii Department of Health.”
Wouldn’t it be great if the Hawaii officials could be hauled before a judge or a committee of Congress to answer questions directly?
I’m glad you’re back. Maybe you were here all along, and I missed you. I enjoy your posts, and you have helped clarify the issue for me—thanks.
The poster responding to you is channeling the spirit of jamese777. He says they are not one and the same. They do post identical material, however, in the exact same style. Fwiw.