[Fantasywriter]

I’m glad you’re back. Maybe you were here all along, and I missed you. I enjoy your posts, and you have helped clarify the issue for me—thanks.

The poster responding to you is channeling the spirit of jamese777. He says they are not one and the same. They do post identical material, however, in the exact same style. Fwiw.

[Red Steel]

I noticed that our new little troll has been visiting around the web doing his thang.

[Kenny Bunk]

The registrar of vital statistics’ stamp says:
“I certify this is a true copy OR abstract of the record on file at the Hawaii Department of Health.”

Gnawed to semantic death by weasels.
The White House received a new, digitally created ABSTRACT, which they then copied in various ways in more or less successful attempts to make it look like a certified copy of an original document. For example, the document they received was just a printout on white stock. To give it a bit more shedazzle, the WH even tried to copy it on green background certificate-type stock! (Office MAX? Depot?)

Had the document been a Certified Copy, The WH would certainly have said so! However endlessly fascinating the Birth Certificate issue is, it is no match IMHO, for the real question:

"Is the sitting POTUS a Natural Born Citizen?"

Wouldn't it be wonderful to have an answer! Instead, all we have witnessed is a marvelous feat of legerdemain, misdirection, and trompe-l'oeil. Team Obama has literally made the elephant disappear in a crowded room.

I am hoping our questions take on new life in the next election cycle. Surely the courts cannot continue to do..........................