Posted on 07/21/2011 7:49:50 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
I did a lot of reading on Zsa-Zsa last night and, aside from the lying and NewAge cultism, what stood out for me is the whoring-your-way-to-the-top ethos, and the men she used (or was used by) to get there. Here's a break down of what the "Greek Goddess" has been doing in the real world:
This cult is exceptionally manipulative and so is Arianna.
You may be interested in this. New Age cultists in power...
I’m glad our top notch jounalists were on top of this./sarc
This one had to sting:
“She took her gay husband’s payoff - and started a blog with leftopaths and barely literate Hollywood celebs.”
No more logic needed.
Goodness! You won’t find any of this on her wiki page!
The tragedy is, she probably would have gotten a lot farther on her own merit and talents if she had played it straight and did not try changing her political colors like a chameleon and hitching herself to sugar daddies. Not to mention the charges of plagiarism regarding her many books.
Who could possibly take her seriously nowadays?
“The tragedy is, she probably would have gotten a lot farther on her own merit and talents if she had played it straight and did not try changing her political colors like a chameleon and hitching herself to sugar daddies. “
Nope, not a chance. She did what she had to do.
She is a one talent Bimbo,who used that talent to get rich.
thx thx.
I think.
Sigh.
How can someone be so eloquent in defending the conservative viewpoint do a 180 like Huffington did? Like David Brock. I’ve never met someone who has gone from conservative to moonbat liberal. It’s always the other way around. I’m living proof. My eyes were opened and I’m ashamed that I ever fell for all that liberal BS.
David Brock turned his coat because he couldn’t get any gay nookie as a conservative.
Arianna is an elitist and leftism is the default setting for elitists. She only played conservative for a few years because her gay husband was running for office as a Republican. She began as a liberal and she quickly returned to the fold after she divorced him and got paid off.
Because she's a psychopath. I first heard of her during her conservative phase, and I remain highly impressed with her then-defense of conservatism. Why not - she understood the philosophy and defended it extremely well. When it was no longer useful to her, however, she tossed it for her next phase.
Evil isn't necessarily stupid, per se. Ultimately of course, spiritually, it is absolutely stupid, because it defies the law of God. But functionally, evil that is stupid gets destroyed pretty fast. Our problem, these days, is that highly intelligent evil has gotten so close to the brass ring that it's snarling in rage at its inability to grasp it, and determined to burn everything down if it can't have it.
But it's not looking at WHAT is stopping it from gettting the brass ring. It can't - it's smart enough to understand the jig is up, if it lets itself admit what's really going on.
So it's "brilliant strategy" is to simply not admit it.
Right off the cliff.
Z smelled like fish..Ari wants to!
...changing her political colors like a chameleon and hitching herself to sugar daddies. Not to mention the charges of plagiarism regarding her many books...
She is not known for her grand ethics and worthy ideals.
What got me is how she wormed her way into Christian circles under the pretense of being a Christian conservative. Geesh! Alot of the power crowd play Christian to get elected.
Also even after her guru (John Rogers) was exposed manipulating young men into having sex with him so they could reach a “higher conscience”, she did not slam him and leave MSIA. Creepy lady.
LOL! Good one!
Wow. After reading that, I have to take a shower.
More vile than Wasserman-Schulz.
And that’s hard to do.
Excellent analysis!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.