Skip to comments.
Bristol physicists break 150-year-old law
University of Bristol ^
| July 19, 2011
| Unknown
Posted on 07/20/2011 7:59:33 AM PDT by decimon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
To: decimon
Oh no this can't be true a CONSENSUS of scientists have agreed on the Wiedemann-Franz law so the science is settled and no further research is needed. (global warming sarcasm)
This is why Al Gore and the other global warming hoaxers are not true users of the scientific method. Science is never settled and is always open to new investigation to prove or disprove hypotheses.
21
posted on
07/20/2011 8:24:30 AM PDT
by
The Great RJ
("The problem with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people's money" M. Thatcher)
To: decimon
22
posted on
07/20/2011 8:26:16 AM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(Oh, well, any excuse to buy a new gun is good enough for me.)
To: decimon
23
posted on
07/20/2011 8:30:09 AM PDT
by
USMCPOP
(Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
To: decimon
This historic discovery is described in a paper published today in Nature Communications. I would say it was discovered 15 years ago by Kane and Fisher and finally verified experimentally by this group. Not to take anything away from their achievement.
24
posted on
07/20/2011 8:30:36 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: decimon
It’s effectively a one dimensional heat sink (and it works better at lower temperatures).
I guess a composite material with trillions of such doped 1D chains ‘baked in’ would act as an effective sink. However: dispersal of waste heat from electronics does seem a better fit than bulk heat transfer from engines.
25
posted on
07/20/2011 8:34:22 AM PDT
by
agere_contra
("Debt is the foundation of destruction" : Sarah Palin.)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
And when he says it applies... and only how he says it does....and, by definition, it never violates the laws of physics, even if it actually does.....
26
posted on
07/20/2011 8:40:14 AM PDT
by
Pecos
(Constitutionalist. Liberty and Honor will not die on my watch.)
To: Cyber Liberty
27
posted on
07/20/2011 8:46:25 AM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: USMCPOP
Thanks. I did a search on ‘purple bronze’ and came up blank.
It would seem that there is no bronze in purple bronze.
28
posted on
07/20/2011 8:47:47 AM PDT
by
decimon
To: All
29
posted on
07/20/2011 8:48:51 AM PDT
by
DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
(Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog for hits!!!)
To: decimon
I thought this was going to be about opening a bootery on Sunday.
ML/NJ
30
posted on
07/20/2011 8:49:30 AM PDT
by
ml/nj
To: aruanan
It's not necessarily the case that it will apply in all situations.
Laws are not descriptions. They are explanations. The LAW predicted that action A would happen under a certain set of conditions. Action A did not happen. Law violated.
31
posted on
07/20/2011 8:51:59 AM PDT
by
Eagle of Liberty
(Shaking My Head on a daily basis)
To: Big Giant Head
32
posted on
07/20/2011 9:11:59 AM PDT
by
Marie Antoinette
(Proud Clinton-hater since 1998.)
To: Eagle of Liberty
We have plenty of other laws with caveats, they don’t work in this or that situation.
To: decimon
34
posted on
07/20/2011 9:24:36 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
("Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different.")
To: aruanan
“A natural law or physical law is a description of observed regularities of behavior. It’s not necessarily the case that it will apply in all situations. And it’s certainly not true that there are “laws” that physical systems must obey. “
So true, but when we use the shorthand word “law” most people think of it as a settled, unchangeable thing.
35
posted on
07/20/2011 9:31:31 AM PDT
by
Persevero
(Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
To: decimon
Unpossible, that was Settled Science™.
36
posted on
07/20/2011 9:33:03 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(From her lips to the voters' ears: Debbie Wasserman Schultz: "We own the economy" June 15, 2011)
To: decimon
Oh no... what’s that poor girl getting into now?....
37
posted on
07/20/2011 10:17:22 AM PDT
by
Hatteras
To: antiRepublicrat
We have plenty of other laws with caveats, they dont work in this or that situation.
Then the law changes and that is fine. What I simply stated was that the experiment with the purple bronze violated the existing defined law.
38
posted on
07/20/2011 10:36:59 AM PDT
by
Eagle of Liberty
(Shaking My Head on a daily basis)
To: decimon; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
Thanks decimon. Pooper cares ping.
purple bronze, a metal with unique one-dimensional electronic properties, indicate that it breaks the Wiedemann-Franz Law
Danged nanny-physics laws, anyway.
· String Theory Ping List ·

· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·
39
posted on
07/20/2011 4:08:13 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Yes, as a matter of fact, it is that time again -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: decimon
.... the Wiedemann-Franz law has proved to be remarkably robust, the ratio varying at most by around 50 per cent amongst the thousands of metallic systems studied.
Close enough for government work.
40
posted on
07/21/2011 4:55:56 AM PDT
by
Condor51
(The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits [A.Einstein])
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson