[E. Pluribus Unum]

So it's OK to fudge data if your intentions are good?

IOW, it's OK to change-climate data to fit your climate-change theory because your intention is to save the planet?

[the invisib1e hand]

So it's OK to fudge data if your intentions are good?

Is this what they call an ad hominem attack? Like, E., do you still beat your wife?

I'd trust a monk's conclusion way before I'd trust a statistician's (who live, incidentally, entirely by hindsight) accusations. OMG, hands down. I'd bet on it if I could.