Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Roger Clemens mistrial was deliberate because Eric Holder did the same thing

Posted on 07/18/2011 10:56:40 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Roger Clemens was accused of the same thing that Eric Holder did in Gunwalker; lying to Congress.

For Mr. Holder to be prosecuting Clemens for his own crime could have been very embarrassing as more and more people became aware of it.

I believe that Holder told his prosecutors to get the case thrown out of court. How else can you explain the stupidity of their mistake?

There will be no retrial. Eric Holder can't afford it.

Blunder jeopardizes Clemens case


TOPICS: Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: ericholder; injusticedepartment; obamascandals; rogerclemens

1 posted on 07/18/2011 10:56:42 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Whatever, it was outrageous that the government went after Roger in the first place.


2 posted on 07/18/2011 10:57:49 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Whatever, it was outrageous that the government went after Roger in the first place.

Of course it was.

So you don't think Attorneys General should be held to the same standards they hold the peasants to?

3 posted on 07/18/2011 10:59:14 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“the system” momentarily corrected itself — or rather, screwed itself. The gods of the system be thanked.


4 posted on 07/18/2011 10:59:58 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand ("America will cease to be great when America ceases to be good." -- Welcome to deToqueville.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
So you don't think Attorneys General should be held to the same standards they hold the peasants to?

Sure.

5 posted on 07/18/2011 11:00:43 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
The ONLY reason they dropped the case was because Holder did the same thing.

The law is still there. They will selectively enforce it as soon as the coast is clear.

6 posted on 07/18/2011 11:02:28 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’d appreciate it if anybody could explain the supposed problem with professional athletes using anabolic steroids for me, I’ve never understood that one.


7 posted on 07/18/2011 11:02:39 AM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varmintman
I’d appreciate it if anybody could explain the supposed problem with professional athletes using anabolic steroids for me, I’ve never understood that one.

I'd appreciate knowing why Eric Holder isn't prosecuting himself for the same crime he accused Roger Clemens of.

8 posted on 07/18/2011 11:04:25 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: varmintman
I’d appreciate it if anybody could explain the supposed problem with professional athletes using anabolic steroids for me, I’ve never understood that one.

The argument is that if steroids are indeed harmful to long-term health, it isn't fair that athletes will feel pressure to take steroids in order to be competitive with those who do juice. That being said, that should be up to the professional leagues to deal with, not the Federal government.

9 posted on 07/18/2011 11:05:50 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Maybe I’m wrong, but a mistrial just means that version is over - the government can retry him. This doesn’t run afoul of the double jeopardy issue, because this basically says the first trial never happened, right?

/I am not a lawyer, but I play one on the internet


10 posted on 07/18/2011 11:15:52 AM PDT by Ro_Thunder (I sure hope there is a New Morning in America soon. All this hope and change is leaving me depressed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator; varmintman
"The argument is that if steroids are indeed harmful to long-term health, it isn't fair that athletes will feel pressure to take steroids in order to be competitive with those who do juice."

The pressure extends all the way into high school sports and junior high sports.

"That being said, that should be up to the professional leagues to deal with, not the Federal government.

I disagree. The leagues would tend to turn the other way and refuse to notice it. This is appropriately the realm of state and federal government.

11 posted on 07/18/2011 11:17:33 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Whatever, it was outrageous that the government went after Roger in the first place.

I thought the Congressional hearings were a bizzare spectacle. I suppose Justice didn't have any choice after he clearly perjured himself. Still, for professional prosecutors to throw case is almost unprecedented. I haven't heard anymore about the case since Friday. I assume the charges could be dismissed "with prejudice", since the mistrial was caused by prosecutorial misconduct.

12 posted on 07/18/2011 11:21:38 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Somewhere in Kenya a village is missing its idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ro_Thunder
Maybe I’m wrong, but a mistrial just means that version is over - the government can retry him.

They deliberately created a mistrial.

They aren't going to retry him.

How would that look, Eric Holder prosecuting a baseball celebrity for the same crime he, himself, is documented to have committed?

13 posted on 07/18/2011 11:22:23 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: varmintman

One major problem is that many of these steroid drugs are illegal without a doctor’s prescription. Since these drugs are illegal unless one is under a doctor’s care and supervision, these drugs were used illegally by these athletes.

But I wonder if legal substances are being used also. A generation ago, a 300 pound player in the NFL was rare. Today there are dozens of players tipping the scales over 300. If they aren’t using the prescription only steroids, I wonder what they are using? It’s hard to believe that multitudes of NFL players in recent years just decided to over eat to gain all that weight.


14 posted on 07/18/2011 11:26:57 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
Yea right. What isn't?

This is appropriately the realm of state and federal government.

15 posted on 07/18/2011 11:49:06 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ro_Thunder

The first trial started (jury was selected).

The judge will decide whether it was a deliberate act and whether there will be a 2nd trial.


16 posted on 07/18/2011 12:11:13 PM PDT by rjeffries
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson