Posted on 07/13/2011 11:23:33 AM PDT by ShadowAce
The W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) is seeking to invalidate a pair of Apple patents so the underlying technologies can be used as part of a royalty-free HTML5 stack.
The W3C's call for prior art is necessary, the organisation argues, because it maintains a strict policy of validating Web standards that can be used without paying for royalties. By finding examples of the technology in use before Apple filed the patents, the W3C can render those patents invalid.
The patented technologies are core components to the W3C's Widget Access Request Policy, which specifies how mobile applications can request sensitive material. It is one of a number of specifications that are closely tied to the W3C's next generation standard for Web pages and applications, HTML5.
Apple has submitted application requests to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office describing technologies that the W3C working group has folded into this specification: pending patent 20070101146, which covers access control procedures, and approved patent 7,743,336, which covers widget security.
As a member of the W3C, Apple should provide a royalty free license for technologies essential to the standards being developed, observers have noted. Thus far, the company has not done so, however.
"It's an unpleasant situation for the W3C to have to confront one of its members, especially such a large and powerful one, but sometimes this can't be avoided," said intellectual property advocate Florian Mueller, in a blog post on the subject.
Apple did not respond immediately to inquiries for this story.
Apple ping
Just Apple being Apple while going after other companies who do the same things they do.
I’m more ticked about the patent itself. It doesn’t matter who the company is—the patent should never have been filed.
There should not be any such thing as a software patent at all.
Agreed. I can almost see copyrights--but not patents.
You’re right about that. They are using the patent to claim control over internet web sites that use HTML5. Of course XHTML was supposed to become the standard but these things are hard to control, can’t be forced on site owners, and legacy sites are not likely convert unless they absolutely have to. Jobs is a control freak who repeatedly displays his democrat party genetics.
Didn’t Lotus start this nonsense about software patents with their “Look and Feel” patent back in the 90s? Experts were opposed to it then and now it’s coming back to haunt everyone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.