[Gargantua]

More obfuscatory blather from someone caught speaking before thinking. Here's a clue, Blabatron:

Nowere in my article did I use the term "abdicate." Each and every "all" and "every" that I did use, I used with full knowledge and specific intent. They are intentional, and precise, not to mention correct.

You can find far more fruitful ways to waste your time than to try to pick apart my writings, especially given your own now repeatedly demonstrated inablity to comprehend what you've read.

And just for your pointless edification, it wasn't an "insult." It was a justified reprimand, which apparently you don't deal with very well.

8^\

[Raider Sam]

In your first post, as a reply to your own article, you used the word abdicated, and you said they all did. They all did not. Where did Fresh Wind say that you used it in the article?

[Fresh Wind]

You used "abdicate" in the comment you added to your article. I was responding to that comment. I'm sorry I didn't make that clear, I should have quoted the exact statement. That word does appear only once and I didn't think that my reference would be so confusing to you.

Allow me to quote from your article:

"Just as had every elected official in American history before her, Sarah left the Alaska governorship to pursue higher goals prior to the conclusion of her full-term."

Once again, I see that pesky all-inclusive word "every". In your second response to me, you said:

"Each and every "all" and "every" that I did use, I used with full knowledge and specific intent. They are intentional, and precise, not to mention correct."

Are you prepared to share your "full knowledge" of American History to back up that statement?

I doubt it.

Instead you have descended even further to childish name calling.

Very impressive. What will you do for an encore?

You're right about one thing, though. There are more fruitful ways to occupy myself that reading your writings. I certainly won't make that mistake again.