Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Casey Anthony juror, 60, quits work and flees town in fear of her life
Daily Mail Reporter ^ | 7/11/11 | Daily Mail Reporter

Posted on 07/11/2011 6:04:29 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta

The woman, known only as juror number 12 left her job and went into hiding fearing co-workers would 'want her head on a platter'.

Her husband said before leaving she told him: 'I’d rather go to jail than sit on a jury like this again.'

He told NBC News he was worried for her health and had his bags packed ready to leave if his 60-year-old wife's name gets released.

The woman, who moved to Florida from Michigan fled the area, retiring from her job working at Publix Grocery over the phone because she didn't feel safe.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2lazy2greedy; anthony; caseyanthony; floridaho; jury4sale; killerbooks4sale; partygirl; reasonablenotperfect; verdict
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 921 next last
To: Palladin

I liked this guys take from another site....’A Rogue Jury’.....pretty much my take as well. Nice to see others agree.

“Commentaries say we should not hold juries responsible because they were ‘doing their job.’..... However, a rogue jury is akin to a vigilante type of justice and usually favors the defendant–which in this case was Casey Anthony.

This jury did not do their job; they did not take the time to examine the testimonies or the presented evidence; they did not take time to review the jury instructions; they did not take time to consider Casey’s actions prior to or after the remains of little Caylee were found. They did not take into consideration Casey’s reaction when the first supposed finding of little Caylee was found (remember her sitting in the cell, smiling–she knew nothing was there) and her reaction when the remains were found oun Suburban Dr (she fainted–allegedly).

This jury did not even consider the pattern of pathological lying in order to maintain the lifestyle she wanted or the fact that she lied about her family so as to glean sympathy for herself.

No, this jury did not do its job because a rogue jury goes against the intent of the jury process.”


621 posted on 07/11/2011 4:05:41 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies]

To: DrewsMum
Reepers (or so called freepers), sound like a bunch of liberals on this subject. (i.e. ready to strip rights away at the blink of an eye...)

Those of us against Roe vs. Wade have gone to D.C. for years and stood outside the Supreme Court in the freezing cold weather.

We do have the right to speak in opposition to jury verdicts or court rulings.

622 posted on 07/11/2011 4:06:26 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

BTW....there’s no reason for anybody to duct tape a child face under any circumstances...unless there is foul play.


623 posted on 07/11/2011 4:07:17 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies]

To: caww

Exactly.

BTW, my favorite courtroom novel is John Grisham’s “The Runaway Jury.”


624 posted on 07/11/2011 4:12:15 PM PDT by Palladin (Sarah Palin in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
I think the problem is, some of these folks have no rational arguments left, so they just toss out random insults. Any insult will do, even if it doesn’t relate to the discussion.

I agree. A couple of people on this thread today are ticked off because we think Casey should have been convicted.

They've been insulting people who are simply expressing their opinion.

It's a democrat tactic...

625 posted on 07/11/2011 4:17:59 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 610 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

I see this threads gone down the tube....not surprising though...the same ‘players’ hit every thread about this case so they can hear themselves gloat about how intellectually sound their take is on this trial...and what dimwits every body else is that disagrees.

They sound like obamas speeches.....rambling on and on and saying the same o’ same o’. Using Constitutional verbage and such just to appear as if they know what they’re talking about. Tactics I’ve seen time and again...just children’s power plays...like school yard bullies...alot of hotair with nothing to bring any light to this case.


626 posted on 07/11/2011 4:21:40 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
It's a democrat tactic...

Yes indeed...signed sealed and delivered exactly so.

627 posted on 07/11/2011 4:23:11 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 625 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

I didn’t read that. But heard of it. Didn’t they make a movie out of that also?


628 posted on 07/11/2011 4:24:22 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies]

To: waxer1

I was absolutely dreading being a juror when I was picked to sit on a murder case. Thankfully my fears where misplaced. The case was in Maryland and while not a DP case the defendant did face life in prison.

The defense wanted me on the jury most likely thinking I could possibly be swayed as I was in my early twenties, in college and had virtually no experience with crime or the courts. Thankfully the other jurors were diligent, paid attention to the deliberations, followed the judges orders and listened to both sides arguments. When the time came to deliberate we took a test vote, 10 for guilt 2 against. At that point our foreman had the panel go through the evidence and we argued it out. Even before closing arguments I was sure of guilt, the evidence was overwhelming, I was a bit shocked 2 people would see it differently.

Only a few hours later we had an unanimous verdict, guilty of 1st degree murder and lesser charges.

Two years ago I was again picked for jury duty in Miami. A civil case involving a car accident. In that case I was voted in as the foreman. During deliberations one of the jurors wanted to know why there was no DNA that we could watch and see what had happened. She believed DNA was like a DVD that could be put into a player to watch. Unbelievable.

Your friends feelings are completely understandable. I would also rather eat glass then go on to another jury. Or as I say, I’d rather scrub a man’s prison with my own toothbrush then do it again. If I’m called I will go but I’ll dread every minute.


629 posted on 07/11/2011 4:35:41 PM PDT by Brytani (Liberals - destroying America since 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: caww; Palladin; Brytani

DENNIS MILLER, FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR:

“Well, I think the system held up in one regard.

You’re guaranteed a jury of our peers and she’s a moron, and they found 12 other morons to form a moron baker’s dozen down there.

I think it should be like the NFL, where you get that red flag, and during the case if you hear something that you don’t like you can stop it right there and go, “I’m voting guilty right now.”

And I would have stopped it when they said her 2-year-old was lost, and she waited 30 days to call the cops.

I would have just thrown my flag and said, “Guilty. I don’t even need to know what the rest of it is, give her some time.”

Because anybody who waits 30 minutes, much less 30 days, she’s guilty of something.

I don’t quite know what it is, but something bad; something rotten in Denmark.”


630 posted on 07/11/2011 4:45:50 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies]

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreilly/2011/07/07/dennis-miller-casey-anthony-murder-acquittal


631 posted on 07/11/2011 4:46:54 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 630 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

Either we respect and live by the Constitution or we don’t. I assumed that conservatives would come down on the side of the Constitution.


632 posted on 07/11/2011 4:48:17 PM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

Actually you are incorrect. You have been doing more than expressing opinion. You have been attacking the juror and the jury system.


633 posted on 07/11/2011 4:55:12 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 625 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

It is a ‘Rat tactic. I think they’ve tipped their hand on this one.


634 posted on 07/11/2011 4:55:27 PM PDT by MizSterious (Apparently, there's no honor when it comes to someone else's retirement funds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 625 | View Replies]

To: caww

Oh, I don’t know. Schoolyard bullies are usually more creative than this. ;)


635 posted on 07/11/2011 4:59:08 PM PDT by MizSterious (Apparently, there's no honor when it comes to someone else's retirement funds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

For the past six months or so there have been numerous threads and posts where so called conservatives have called for the elimination of the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights.

Police brutality is ok as long as the one being brutalized is a ‘leftest’.

Throw out the jury system because the verdict did not meet their desire to see a certain outcome.

Raise the taxes on ‘those’ people, but not me.

Take the rights from ‘those’ people because they play for the other team.

They don’t pray to my flavor of God so they are to be punished.

And we wonder why this country is in the miserable shape it is in.


636 posted on 07/11/2011 5:00:39 PM PDT by 11Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

Love Dennis Miller. Wish he had the hour Glenn Beck left.


637 posted on 07/11/2011 5:00:47 PM PDT by MizSterious (Apparently, there's no honor when it comes to someone else's retirement funds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 630 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Thank you for your reasoned comments. I also try to be polite to everyone, even my democrat acquaintances when we disagree.

I have not called anyone a name, although people in the opposition have been calling people buffoons.

I have never attacked the jury system, and it would be bizarre for anyone to think that.

I do criticize the verdict, as I criticize OBAMACARE.

It’s a free country. Free speech exists.

This verdict is a travesty.


638 posted on 07/11/2011 5:06:24 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

It’s very dismaying to watch the mob mentality. I’ve watched posters who have railed against judging other’s on religion or morals go ballistic wanting vengeance in this case. I don’t suppose I’ll take them too seriously in the future. I wish I saw more of the attitude of hoping that Casey finds Jesus and repents and turns her life around.


639 posted on 07/11/2011 5:07:36 PM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 614 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Dennis is the best! He always says exactly the right thing.


640 posted on 07/11/2011 5:07:56 PM PDT by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 921 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson