Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Scarpetta

No, No, No....you are missing my point completely.

I, myself, think she did something. You don’t need to convince me of that.

I am defending the jury—thats all. I believe in the jury system and I think they did the job as they saw it.

If you are objective, you can see their point. It is possible that you would come to a different conclusion, but the point is that she got a fair trial in front a jury of her peers and they decided the prosecution dropped the ball.

My frustration with the folks on FR is that they yell and scream about the constitution and the basis for our government and judicial system and how it is abused. But when it operates in total openness, and the result is not what they want, people are screaming. Their inability to accept that the process works, even when they don’t agree with it, is extremely frustrating.

The system worked. Justice—the equal application of law to all parties—was served.

Now I will drop it.

And yes, I think she is a whack job and I hope she does not have any more children.

PS: How you have liked to have been on trial and had Georgie Boy as the police officer/detective in charge of your investigation?


550 posted on 07/07/2011 9:43:33 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Is there anyone that Obama won't toss under the bus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt

But what about Caylee? Did she get justice?


554 posted on 07/07/2011 9:46:14 AM PDT by Mmogamer (I refudiate the lamestream media, leftists and their prevaricutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies ]

To: Vermont Lt

If you are objective, you can see their (jury) point.

No. If you are as stupid as they are you can see their point. The one juror and alternate juror, who have talked so far, have proven they can’t even comprehend their duties as to assigning guilt or innocence (they considered sentencing which is a no no)....

...and one of the nitwits felt that Casey was a good mother.

OMG, they shouldn’t be defended, they should be shunned for their idiocy.


559 posted on 07/07/2011 9:49:35 AM PDT by rbmillerjr (Hannity is a moron. Done with him. Casey...watch out for Karma you murderous sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies ]

To: Vermont Lt

“I am defending the jury—thats all.”

Ah, no, not quite. You’re throwing out bogus analogies, refusing to answer questions regarding details of the evidence. A much closer analogy, btw, can be found in the Scott Peterson case, where prosecutors were readying an indictment against Scotty boy even before the remains washed up.


560 posted on 07/07/2011 9:49:46 AM PDT by at bay (My father was born with 28 ounces of flesh in 1924 then went on to become Mr. (Glenn) Holland.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies ]

To: Vermont Lt
Their inability to accept that the process works, even when they don’t agree with it, is extremely frustrating.

That frustration works two ways, for we understand the system is broken....has been ...and will continue to be. Just as our Government is broken.

712 posted on 07/07/2011 1:53:23 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson