“Would you care to apologize for the lie comment?”
No, but I would apologize for your presence on this forum to any newbies or lurkers thinking this poster is representative of the intellect herein.
What Ashton conceded was the EXACT sequence of events we can, of course, not know, short of a videotape. He also said he was confident he proved murder one. Do you know exactly how Laci Peterson died? Was she dead before or after she was placed in SF bay? How do you know a satanic cult didn’t sacrifice her? We will never know unless Scott elects to talk from death row. Yet the compelling proof in that case was also his lifestyle and being able to place him in the SF bay area.
Granted, Geragos wasn’t half the con man Baez turned out to be. I’ll give this to the defense-—they put up so many smoke and mirrors that the local smoke and mirrors wholesale supply store was forced to close temporarily for being out of stock.
Watch the interview for crying out loud. He and the alternate juror were on the same interview. He agreed with the juror that they do not “know what really happened” to Caylee. As in, don’t know if it was and accident or if someone did something purposely to cause her death.
When asked if we will ever know what really happened to Caylee, Ashton said, definitively, “No, we never will. We never will”.
The prosecution put the jurors in an untenable situation because they didn’t establish one scenario and build their case on that.
I understand the emotionalism surrounding wanting someone to pay for Caylees death and it probably should be Casey in some way but the prosecution screwed it up along with the detective who didn’t investigate the first time he was told of the skull in the swamp.