Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: at bay
>>What Ashton conceded was the EXACT sequence of events we can, of course, not know<<

Watch the interview for crying out loud. He and the alternate juror were on the same interview. He agreed with the juror that they do not “know what really happened” to Caylee. As in, don’t know if it was and accident or if someone did something purposely to cause her death.

When asked if we will ever know what really happened to Caylee, Ashton said, definitively, “No, we never will. We never will”.

The prosecution put the jurors in an untenable situation because they didn’t establish one scenario and build their case on that.

I understand the emotionalism surrounding wanting someone to pay for Caylees death and it probably should be Casey in some way but the prosecution screwed it up along with the detective who didn’t investigate the first time he was told of the skull in the swamp.

537 posted on 07/07/2011 9:36:13 AM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies ]


To: CynicalBear

“as in”. as in nothing. Where is the wizard of Oz when I need him!


546 posted on 07/07/2011 9:41:18 AM PDT by at bay (My father was born with 28 ounces of flesh in 1924 then went on to become Mr. (Glenn) Holland.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies ]

To: CynicalBear

Not true. He never meant he did not know if it were accidental or murder. Ashton states he does not know exact cause of death. No one buys the accident theory. It’s preposterous.


547 posted on 07/07/2011 9:41:18 AM PDT by Tx Angel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson