Keep in mind the jurors wanted DIRECT evidence - which is basically either photos, video or eye witness testimony.
They had direct evidence of a dead child through photos. They had direct evidence of a hair in the trunk with banding proving death. Anyone could infer from the photos and the hair that a dead Caylee was in that trunk.
Casey was seen on video (again direct evidence) with the boyfriend by 8pm on june 16 - no Caylee. Even if she wasn't dead yet, they could have inferred she had been left alone somewhere - a 2 year old - in the car? In the woods alive? No reason at all to suspect she was with anyone else. Infer she is already dead because she is never seen again.
The jury really didn't even think at all on this one - made up their minds before it was even over.
Exacty! There sure as h*ll wasn't anyone that came forward saying they babysat Caylee during any of that time! I can only hope that little girl was asleep and never knew the final act committed by her mother!
There wasn’t a single shred of evidence that George Anthony was present when Caley went missing. Casey admits she had her daughter at the time. George repeatedly asks Casey at their home, in prison and in front of witnesses where Caley is only to have Casey repeat her lies or come up with a new one. Not once did she ever say anything about George being there or being involved. Yet, jurors “believe” he was involved (as do some people on here).
What evidence did Baez present that George was there? Not a single shred and in fact at his closing said “there is no evidence George Anthony was involved in the death of Caley”. But, we’ll hear these jurors in their defense and those who wish to defend them still claim he was involved.
Scary, that people can be told by the defense themselves that a person is not involved, have not a shred of evidence of that persons involvement and still, somehow, decide they were involved anyway.