There wasn’t a single shred of evidence that George Anthony was present when Caley went missing. Casey admits she had her daughter at the time. George repeatedly asks Casey at their home, in prison and in front of witnesses where Caley is only to have Casey repeat her lies or come up with a new one. Not once did she ever say anything about George being there or being involved. Yet, jurors “believe” he was involved (as do some people on here).
What evidence did Baez present that George was there? Not a single shred and in fact at his closing said “there is no evidence George Anthony was involved in the death of Caley”. But, we’ll hear these jurors in their defense and those who wish to defend them still claim he was involved.
Scary, that people can be told by the defense themselves that a person is not involved, have not a shred of evidence of that persons involvement and still, somehow, decide they were involved anyway.
Yep, very true. And what makes that worse is that the person who actually did it, they deem not guilty.
They insist George was involved with no evidence at all other than he was combative. They have tons of stuff indicating who done it, and they ignore it all.
Go figger.
I totally agree. Just the mention by that sleaze Baez and folks, even on here, are believing casey was molested by her Dad. Unreal