[MizSterious]

"Now that the defense has rested, I've been trying to make sense of Baez's outrageous opening statement, and then the complete failure to prove ANY of it."

Awhile ago on HLN, one of the commentators said this exact thing was going to be a problem. According to this HLN lawyer, you can only use what you've proven with evidence in a closing statement, so much of what he said in opening might have to be left out. Any legal experts here know if that is true?

[truthkeeper]

We are pinging our expert to post #263 to answer a question. Thank you.