Posted on 06/24/2011 10:52:15 PM PDT by LucyT
Leon Panetta
While a Southern California based congressman in the 1970s and 80s, CIA director and Obama Secretary of Defense nominee Leon Panetta, was close to a pro-communist, Santa Cruz based peace activist named Lucy Haessler.
In spite (or perhaps because of) Haesslers involvement with the Womens International Democratic Federation, Panetta placed a tribute in the Congressional Record, April 11, 1984, to mark Haesslers 80th birthday.
Panetta noted that Lucy Haessler attended several conferences of the East German based organization in France, the Soviet Union, Poland and East Germany.
He did neglect to mention however that the W.I.D.F. was a well-documented Soviet front.
Congressman Panetta also commended Haessler for her activism in opposition to the Vietnam War and the deployment of US Cruise and Pershing II missiles in Europe. Haesslers activism in the Womens International League for Peace and Freedom and Women Strike for Peace, are also noted. Both organizations were also affiliated with another Soviet front, the World Peace Council and were heavily infiltrated by the Communist Party USA and its allies.
Congressman Panetta rounded off the tribute by hoping that Mrs. Haessler would continue her valiant efforts, and with her help, we may yet realize her 80 year old dream: Peace on Earth.
This tribute raises an important question. In the context of the time, in what was effectively the height of the Cold War, why did Congressman Panetta consider it appropriate to praise an activist so clearly sympathetic to the other side? The Soviet affiliations of the Womens International Democratic Federation were well known at the time. Given Panettas close ties to the Santa Cruz left, including to long time communist Hugh DeLacy and his own leftist views, it is inconceivable that Panetta did not understand the significance of Haesslers activism.
When confronted about the tribute by Human Events magazine in their May 12, 1984 issue, Panetta pleaded ignorance of the far left nature of Womens International League for Peace and Freedom, but indicated that if he had known, it wouldnt have mattered anyway.
Said Panetta, Let me tell you something. I dont know if you know about Santa Cruz, but Santa Cruz is a center for people whove been activists in all kinds of organizations. If I started doing those kinds of checks on people who help out Id never stop. Its that kind of place.
Panetta also described Lucy Haessler as, An activist in Democratic politics, and worked in the campaigns ever since Ive been running.
Lucy Haessler organized the 1979 national Womens International League for Peace and Freedom Biennial Conference at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Haessler invited three main speakers: Communist Party affiliated scientist and peace activist Linus Pauling, Randall Forsberg, founder of the thoroughly socialist infiltrated Nuclear Weapons Freeze Campaign and Rep. Leon Panetta.
Leon Panetta might claim that Lucy Haessler was just another Democratic Party activist. However in 1966, Lucy Haessler and her then husband Carl Haessler, a Detroit United Auto Workers official and former Socialist Party USA member, sponsored an event that put them firmly in the Communist Party camp.
April 28, 1966, Carl and Lucy Haessler were sponsors of the Herbert Aptheker Testimonial Dinner, held on the occasion of the Communist Party USAs senior theoretician, Herbert Apthekers 50th birthday, the publication of his 20th book and the 2nd anniversary of the American Institute for Marxist Studies. The event was held in the Sutton Ballroom, The New York Hilton, Avenue of the Americas, 53rd to 54th Street, New York City. Almost all speakers, organizers and sponsors were known members or supporters of the Communist Party USA.
Note that Mr. and Mrs. Haesslers names appear on the sponsors list right above that of then Communist Party USA Chairman Gus Hall.
It is quite possible that Leon Panetta was not aware of the depth of Lucy Haesslers Communist Party affiliations, he might just not have known of all of his close friend Hugh DeLacys communist background.
It seems strange however, that both of the Panetta Congressional Record tributes we have identified so far, were awarded to Communist Party affiliates.
As Director of the CIA, and probable US Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta is entrusted with the responsibility of safeguarding US National Security. Should it then be of concern that Panetta has been on such friendly terms with clear enemies of that security? Is there a hint here of the fox guarding the chicken house?
The US Senate needs to do its job. Before he is approved for the most important defense post in the nation, Leon Panetta needs to do some explaining to the American public.
Which of the 100 Senators sworn to protect the Constitution of the United States of America has the courage to put personal popularity to one side and begin asking Leon Panetta some very probing questions?
Panetta Report 1: Leon Panetta Paid Tribute to Two Longtime Communists
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2739220/posts
.
Panetta Report 2: Leon Panetta Paid Tribute to Pro-Communist Peace Activist
. . . . Check out article.
All I can say is it don’t surprise me anymore! We got about 70 communist in the House. Maybe 15 to 20 in the Senate One fearless leader in the WH and numerous ones spread though the government, Schools colleges etc!!!
All I can say is it dont surprise me anymore! We got about 70 communist in the House. Maybe 15 to 20 in the Senate One fearless leader in the WH and numerous ones spread though the government, Schools colleges etc!!!
Just like a cancer.
Cancer, indeed. His appointment is nothing but the continuation of the well planned and coordinated effort to destroy America and everything she stands for. It’s so very, very scary. Our children and grandchildren will not know the freedoms we have known. Sadly, it’s our own fault by voting on skin color and good hair rather than morals and values.
Yes, it’s extremely sad. The evil of communism has taken hold and won’t let go. Our people have been dumbed down and now we’re suffering the consequences. It’s all very demonic/evil. 0bama is a very wicked man and only the blind can’t see it.
Communism, unfortunately, is very much alive, reaching the highest levels of the current US government as this article points out.
One quibble with the the geography in the posted article: Panetta, as a congressman, was based in Northern California, not Southern California. Santa Cruz is just south of San Jose.
Why do I feel like the Clintons are involved?
I am not voting for any Senator that voted for this in 2012.
As far as I can tell, there are no dead bodies mentioned in the posted article.
Could you please explain your thinking about the possible connection between the Clintons and Panetta and the Commies he praised and associated with?
I have just read so much about the Clintons ties to China; selling secrets to them; etc.
I just saw this dates back to 2001.
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/1/31/185632.shtml
I know the Clintons have strong ties to Riady. He was suppose to thrown out of out country; but read an article somewhere he was in our recently.
Panetta Report 2: Leon Panetta Paid Tribute to Pro-Communist Peace Activist
Panetta Report 3: Leon Panetta and the Santa Cruz Socialists
http://trevorloudon.com/2011/06/panetta-report-3-leon-panetta-and-the-santa-cruz-socialists/
.
I guess we will have to operate! I hope the Patient survives!
Poison by lead might be part of the cure.
Thanks for the ping!
Free Republic Articles, w/ comments:
Panetta Report 1: Leon Panetta Paid Tribute to Two Longtime Communists
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2739220/posts
Panetta Report 2: Leon Panetta Paid Tribute to Pro-Communist Peace Activist
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2739713/posts
Panetta Report 3: Leon Panetta and the Santa Cruz Socialists
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2739977/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.