To: bopdowah
it still leaves government in charge of administering the welfare assistance.
Local or state governments would be in charge,not the feds.Read the contract again carefully.Each state would be in charge.Take it out of the hands of the feds and put it in the hands of a smaller government and things could turn around in a positive way.
38 posted on
06/22/2011 10:38:22 AM PDT by
gimme1ibertee
("Criticism......brings attention to an unhealthy state of things"-Winston Churchill)
To: gimme1ibertee
Local or state governments would be in charge,not the feds.
That would be an improvement. Then the states would compete with each other, which is the way it was intended.
I still like the idea of private charity parties.
52 posted on
06/22/2011 11:23:48 AM PDT by
bopdowah
("Unlike King Midas, whatever the Gubmint touches sure don't turn to Gold!')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson