[American Constitutionalist]

" Don’t get excited everyone. In mere seconds the post will be filled with those telling us what a waste of time and a distraction and how we can’t win with this issue and.... "

Norm ? what makes this case different is that it is the Supreme Court making this decision allowing discovery.
Is not ? the Supreme Court in a indirect way saying that , yes, Obama is not eligible, but, the states need to take care of this, not the Supreme Court ?....

There you go OBots and Obama supporters, the US Supreme Court in this case has said that we do have the right and legal standing to question Obama's eligibility to be president.
Now only ? if the proper legal authorities were to take a 2nd look and investigate Obama's records.

[MHGinTN]

State attorneys general need to open a can of whupass on the bastard. If five or six would do it for the fraud perpetrated on those states, the sonofabitch would have to resign or be indicted.

[ml/nj]

Is not ? the Supreme Court in a indirect way saying that , yes, Obama is not eligible, but, the states need to take care of this, not the Supreme Court ?....

I like Orly, but I think she is wrong here. The Presidential election is one held by an Electoral College. The States do not even have to hold elections to determine whom they "send" to the Electoral College, and the people they "send" are Constitutionally free to vote for whomever they want to. The 20th Amendment to the Constitution clearly envisions that the Electoral Collage might choose someone who is not eligible. Eligibility is clearly the responsibility of Congress, not the States, and Congress abdicated.

ML/NJ