And just who, EXACTLY, would you hold responsible?
The PUC members who authorized the installation, the “Green” groups who pushed for it, the manufacturers of the blades, the guys who actually installed the turbines, congress for creating the tax breaks that made the facility profitable, the investors?
Guess we will have to build another prison, maybe not “Green” wind energy powered though?
Sixty birds a year is hardly a crises, nature kills many times more than that without windmills.
Of those sixty, how many are Eagles?
I doubt anyone knows, the article is emotion driving drivel, I wonder what group actually sponsored it.
the corporation profiting off the windmills obviously.
Sixty birds a year is hardly a crises, nature kills many times more than that without windmills. Of those sixty, how many are Eagles?
They're all eagles genius, read the article. And it is a crisis: "It would take 167 pairs of local nesting golden eagles to produce enough young to compensate for their mortality rate related to wind energy production," biologist Doug Bell, manager of the East Bay Regional Park District's wildlife program, said. "We only have 60 pairs" Furthermore, what nature does is irrelevant. It is a felony to kill eagles. period. These corporations are not above the law anymore than you or I are. They need to be held accountable.
the article is emotion driving drivel
the article is perfectly factual and honest and; what's more, there are hundreds of articles on the internet about this. The only drivel here is your weak attempt to defend the indefensible, the slaughter of a protected species.