[Logic n' Reason]

Isn’t that what romm-knee is doing??

[TheThirdRuffian]

Mitt Romney should do it.

[Melas]

The impediment is money. In this case it would be throwing it away. Hard to attract donations to your cause when that’s the plan.

[wolfpat]

This would require 0 to spend money on the primary.
Us too.
Also, he might have to debate with an R earlier than expected?
Irrelevant since he's not limited to telling the truth.

[RowdyFFC]

Yes, Romney should be primaried against Obamajad, but the rest would have a hard time mouthing all the freaking lies they would have to spew to pick up Obamajad’s freak voters on the commie side.

Unless you are a total narcissistic sociopath, telling bigger and whoppier lies than Obamajad is an impossibility.

[Diogenesis]

Mitt Romney COULD become a HERO to America.

Mitt, Run for President as a Democrat.

I pledge to vote for you.

[trumandogz]

The candidate would get no traction and Obama would not have to debate.

[Squidpup]

Randall Terry announced for the D nomination

[svcw]

Romney and Huntsman are the ones who should cross the line to the dem primary.

[Hoodat]

Why doesn't a Republican nominee cross the line and run for the Dem nomination? What would be the impediments to this?

Here's the problem. Obama won't have to debate him, and he won't have to spend campaign cash to fight a primary challenge. It won't even matter if Obama loses all the state primaries. Come convention time, Obama will still be the nominee. He has already proven that one does not have to get the most primary votes to be selected as the nominee. Just ask Hillary Clinton about that one.

[Lorianne]

I expected Trump to do that.

[oneamericanvoice]

Why would a Republican, a conservative one at that, cross over to run as a Democrat? They would get no backing by the DNC, state, or local party. There is a movement to let people vote across party lines, which I find horrendous. Democrats try to infiltrate Republicans. We don’t try to infiltrate Democrats.

[napscoordinator]

Because next time we have a Republican President running for second term, we don’t want a Democrat doing the same thing. Can you imagine a Democrat doing that to President Bush last time and then after the primary decide to run for Independent? We could not afford to lose many votes in 2000 and 2004.

[mad_as_he$$]

What line?

[Wolfstar]

Yours is a profoundly naive question, and I’m being charitable in calling it naive.

[pallis]

I’ve been wondering the same thing, more or less. Obama is easily beatable, and any one of a dozen Democrats could do it. If they won’t, the Republicans should run a Democrat against him. There are a lot of Republican Democrats, Mitt for one.

[jersey117]

It sure would be fun watching obama get dragged threw the mud by both sides. His magic has warn off and he has no record of accomplishment to run on. Should be easy to beat him with the right candidate.

[Jonty30]

They do already. They are the blue dogs.

[freekitty]

I thought they already were. RINO

[joelt]

Trump!