The development of a justified use of deadly force at night to defend against criminal mischief is interesting and has its roots way back in the early days of Texas' development, but I think it's still a valid law. We don't know whether those trespassing and damaging property don't have a more malevolent intent, and waiting to find out could be deadly.
I'm very familiar with the history behind the Texas legislation, and if it works for Texas I'm good with that. If trespassing at night is held to be so serious that it legitimizes killing somebody, then IMHO, the state should put it's metaphoric money where its mouth is and make it punishable by death. It's a risk the perpetrator takes. If that seems too severe, then they ought to re-evaluate the law to where there needs to be at least a perceived threat. Again, JMHO.