You have to accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior. An infant is incapable of doing that.
The age of reason. God has given this assurance, as in David and his child.
You have to accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior. An infant is incapable of doing that.
It is therefore possible for infants to be saved, even though they have neither Faith nor works.
You have to accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior. An infant is incapable of doing that.-——————
But they are innocent until the age of accountability...
So where do you believe the INFANT GOES?
http://www.catholic.com/library/Infant_Baptism.asp
Although Fundamentalists are the most recent critics of infant baptism, opposition to infant baptism is not a new phenomenon. In the Middle Ages, some groups developed that rejected infant baptism, e.g., the Waldenses and Catharists. Later, the Anabaptists (”re-baptizers”) echoed them, claiming that infants are incapable of being baptized validly. But the historic Christian Church has always held that Christ’s law applies to infants as well as adults, for Jesus said that no one can enter heaven unless he has been born again of water and the Holy Spirit (John 3:5). His words can be taken to apply to anyone capable of belonging to his kingdom. He asserted such even for children: “Let the children come to me, and do not hinder them; for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 19:14).
More detail is given in Luke’s account of this event, which reads: “Now they were bringing even infants to him that he might touch them; and when the disciples saw it, they rebuked them. But Jesus called them to him, saying, ‘Let the children come to me, and do not hinder them; for to such belongs the kingdom of God’” (Luke 18:15–16).
..............................
Doesn’t anyone read the Bible anymore?
So, then infants who die young, foetuses, mentally challenged folks etc. are darned to heck in your philosophy?