Posted on 05/31/2011 10:09:12 PM PDT by PresidentSuit
This is comedy gold! Rep Anthony Weiner being grilled by reporters on CNN's the Situation Room and can't answer a direct question with a straight answer. "Did you send that picture to a college girl in Seattle?" "Well, let's say that I was giving a speech to 45,000 people a guy in the back of the room threw a pie at me..." "Congressman, that's not the same as this situation." "Okay, let me answer it this way. Suppose I was giving a speech..." Looking guiltier and guiltier as the minutes drag on. Look how he tap dances around the direct questions. Liberals HATE being accountable for anything! LOL #weinergate
What an interview! He might as well have had “GUILTY” tattooed on his forehead.
You either indignantly say you never sent it, and it’s not your wiener, or it is your skinny little cocktail weenie and you Did try to impress a young student with it in your grey skivvies.
Mental problem
BFL
I can’t understand the psychology of men who call what was once known as “the family jewels” as their “junk.” Can anyone explain this change to me?
Who hires a lawyer when a crime has been committed? /s
Weiner, roasted?
Or, roasted Weiner?
You be the judge...
‘____________explain this change to me?’
Really? you never heard about the guy some months ago tell a TSA agent not to ‘touch his junk?’ Think it was in San Diego.
So that became all the rage for a while, and now has been adopted over ‘family jewels,’ I guess.
It could change back . . .
Then again, one or the other pet expression probably circulates in their particular ranks of guys.
Sadly, this loser mutterfrucker a$$hole has designs on being the next mayor of NYC. Not that I give a rat$ a$$.
He’s a jerk through and through.
He’s a “Peter Tweeter” as so,e Freeper called him!!
Maybe just maybe, he’s trying to get Huma to diverce him.
“It’s as if he went out of his way to sound as guilty as possible.”
I would be astonished if he were not guilty. That said, he deserves a small modicum of credit for not out-and-out lying the way Bill Clinton did repeatedly. I do find it astonishing that a liberal Dem would draw the line at lying about a private matter since they routinely lie about public policy matters.
For example, Weiner says the Ryan plan would “end Medicare” because it would voucherize it. http://crooksandliars.com/taxonomy/term/20569,962,7621 That’s the equivalent of saying that anyone who believes in education vouchers is in favor of “ending” public education. It’s an absurd, absolutely indefensible position carefully crafted for sheeple who are not paying attention. Perhaps Anthony Weiner simply has reached his own personal limit on the amount of lying he can commit in a single week.
“It’s as if he went out of his way to sound as guilty as possible.”
I would be astonished if he were not guilty. That said, he deserves a small modicum of credit for not out-and-out lying the way Bill Clinton did repeatedly. I do find it astonishing that a liberal Dem would draw the line at lying about a private matter since they routinely lie about public policy matters.
For example, Weiner says the Ryan plan would “end Medicare” because it would voucherize it. http://crooksandliars.com/taxonomy/term/20569,962,7621 That’s the equivalent of saying that anyone who believes in education vouchers is in favor of “ending” public education. It’s an absurd, absolutely indefensible position carefully crafted for sheeple who are not paying attention. Perhaps Anthony Weiner simply has reached his own personal limit on the amount of lying he can commit in a single week.
In any case, Huma Weiner being a Muslim, all her husband need do for a divorce is say "I divorce you!" three times and he would be divorced. This is how Obama's father said he ended his prior marriage before marrying Obama's mama. (According to US Immigration records.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.