Posted on 05/27/2011 5:16:39 AM PDT by bcsco
You nailed it as far as I am concerned, let us not even say give a good speech let us say can read fairly well except he whistles thru his teeth ha ha ha
what a joke
Hey, everyone, thanks a lot for your input. That’s exactly what I was looking for. I’m going to take this as erroneous information, if not disinformation, though I’m tending toward the latter.
As I stated, I haven’t followed the birther issue all that closely so these two seemingly new issues were definitely new to me. As Always FReepers have been there before. That’s what I figured and you guys didn’t let me down.
Life Magazine archives
“Kenya lies under the sword - May 4, 1953 - Page 143”
side note: just discovered this site. Take a look. Just the advertisements are worth the time, not to mention the photos and the history.
http://books.google.com/books?id=N0EEAAAAMBAJ#all_issues_anchor
*
well stated!
So nice to see someone, while denigrating the doofus in charge, not use the similar word "baboon".
I don’t consider wikipedia to be a reliable data source for this information.
Both were brought up the day Obama released his birth certificate and were quickly debunked. Most birthers don't make those arguments anymore.
if you are genuinely curious, look for posts by Butterdezillion, Hotlanta Mike, ml/nj, and Satindoll.
Butterdezillion has done incredibly research, and gotten things directly from Hawaii DOH.
(like a Birth Index with Virginia Sunahara on it, and a letter, saying they have no record of her...).
Satindoll has information going back to 2008. She wasn’t a birther. She always did candidate research. but noticed even then, that records were being scrubbed.
Red Steel, Bluecat6, and Robinmasters, are also great sources of serious, well researched information.
ml/nj found a simple clear example, that anyone can do, even a non-techie:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2720608/posts?page=23#23
here’s another simple clear photo of evidence of fraud:
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=186343
Bluecat6 pointed out, that the very purpose of security paper, is to reveal fraud. and it does. (sorry, no link.)
and a few other quick ones:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/irrefutable-proof-obamas-new-birth.html
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/comparative-analysis-by-pro-graphics.html
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/13/research-summary-on-hawaii-birth-certificate-number-151-1961-010641/
...and of course, there is the Connecticut SSN, which needs no analysis, since it is clearly fradulent by definition, since he never lived in CT, it would be impossible to get.
b
” “A crying shame to have elected this bafoon.”
So nice to see someone, while denigrating the doofus in charge, not use the similar word “baboon”. “
/// you reminded me of a poem... written -BY- the “doofus” in question...
UNDERGROUND
Under water grottos, caverns
Filled with apes
That eat figs.
Stepping on the figs
That the apes
Eat, they crunch.
The apes howl, bare
Their fangs, dance,
Tumble in the
Rushing water,
Musty, wet pelts
Glistening in the blue.
Several forensic experts have already debunked the new but not improved birth certificate which Obama released last month.
Dr. Jerome Corsi who wrote the newly released book “Where’s The Birth Certificate?” announced on the Alex Jones show the other day that he has figured out who the forger is and will name names shortly.
Interesting choice of venue to air his latest crackpot theory.
Great Theory, except for one thing. On the Nordyke birth certificates it says “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”.
How can you argue that isn’t supposed to be there when it is in fact “there” on an original birth certificate from 1961?
As for your comments about “Kenya” not being a country in 1961, it may not have been a country to the rest of us, but to the people who lived there it was quite likely referred to as “Kenya”, named after Mt. Kenya I believe.
Barack Sr. Saying he was from “Kenya” was probably similar to someone else saying he was from “Texas” before it became a Republic.
These weren’t my comments. They came from an email I received yesterday.
Just one of many radio shows that Corsi has appeared on promoting his book and speaking about the fake birth certificate.
Sorry.
No problem, I just didn’t want you to misunderstand the source.
Kenya was a common name back then.
Kenya, East Africa was not, it was British East Africa.
Using an online dictionary you can do show the difference. ‘Kenya, East Africa’ or ‘Kenya East Africa’ will not show up. ‘British East Africa’ does.
There are lots of references to Kenya in 1961, including the immigration files for BHO Senior.
As to BHO’s age. His well documented age is based on the 1936 birthday....a date he started using on forms in 1962. But up until then his birth date was 6/18/1934. It is on numerous immigration forms and he used that date on the I-539 form he filled out in his own hand on August 31, 1961 - supposedly 27 days AFTER the birth of his supposed son. But in that form he does not acknowledge his son at all.
Why the change. Maybe mama (or grandma) was not familiar with his exact DOB and misstated on the original forms. There is nothing indicating he was anywhere near the birth when it happened and he may not have been aware at all as the evidence (yes evidence) of the I-539 form filled out August 31, 1961 shows. No claim of a son - at all!.
So mama (or grandma) messed up. But later when he wanted to leverage the situation to stay in the US a few more years he changed his DOBs on the I-539 forms to match.....
He just wanted to stay in the US a few more years...a little lying on the I-539 was no big deal....
Source or proof, please?
If you are genuinely curious, you have to include my posts as well.
Elendur conveniently fails to mention that I've clearly demonstrated why most (if not all) of the points he just posted are simply not true.
I've been called all kinds of names (troll, Obot, etc.), but not one person has successfully invalidated any of the major arguments or analyses I've made. Swordmaker is about the only person who's even made a serious effort.
He tried to mount a defense of the "it's a fake because the letters don't curve at the left theory," and made a couple of good points, but had nothing further to say to my response, since my analysis was correct.
I've also been corrected on a couple of minor points - Stig Waidelich's birth and file dates being among them - and have readily admitted to and corrected any such errors.
I will be the first to add that butterdezillion's postings and research are well worth looking at. She has had direct interaction with Hawaii, whereas I have not, and has relevant commentary on how those interactions have gone. She and I so far have some differences in our conclusions, but I respect both her and her research.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.