Hope this study wasn't cobbled together.
1 posted on
05/24/2011 11:11:33 AM PDT by
decimon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: decimon
Except the taste.
Which, in the event I drink a coke (whatever flavor, dr. pepper, pepsi, coke, RC, etc), then I want it to taste good.
HFCS doesn’t.
52 posted on
05/24/2011 12:14:04 PM PDT by
Ro_Thunder
(I sure hope there is a New Morning in America soon. All this hope and change is leaving me depressed)
To: decimon
First, sucrose is 50% fructose and 50% glucose. Second, the HFCS used in most food is either HFCS 55 (55% fructose, 45% glucose) or HFCS 42 (42% fructose, 58% glucose). That tiny 5% fructose in the HFCS 55 foods as part of the total sugar intake isn't going to make any difference. And if the foods one eats using HFCS is split evenly between the 55 and 42, then one is actually eating less fructose than if he uses straight sucrose.
54 posted on
05/24/2011 12:18:25 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: decimon
These are the same kind of people who worked for the tobacco companies who said that smoking wasn’t bad for you. Don’t believe any “study” from a group that is making hundreds of millions of dollars on the product they are supporting.
64 posted on
05/24/2011 12:51:01 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
To: decimon
I don’t believe this.
For one thing they taste different.
Second, the enzymes and chemical processes involved are different.
66 posted on
05/24/2011 1:06:34 PM PDT by
BuffaloJack
(Obama did not learn incompetence; he was born to it.)
74 posted on
05/24/2011 2:12:38 PM PDT by
loungitude
( The truth hurts.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson