“This isn’t a carefully thought out reasoned position, it is a Alinsky style personal attack because this poster is incapable of making a reasoned argument FOR Palin.”
Disclaimer - I’m for Palin. Now on with the show.
1. “Alinsky style”, sounds like you who are the one making a personal attack. Frankly, none of us like to see our candidate choice(s) screw up with the dinosaur media (he was in the friendliest press environment he is ever going to see in his campaign).
2. “Right of return” was a gotcha type question; a lot of people didn’t know what the hell Chris was talking about, so that was no big deal.
3. The article was about Cain’s performance, so proselytizing about Palin was not relevant.
4. Cain, like Bachmann before him, needs to brush up on his interview skills (Of course Palin had a similar problem some time ago).
5. His poor performance re the Cain plan reversal tended to overshadow the many good things he had to say.
6. If Palin and Bachmann don’t run, he may be all we have left.
7. Santorum is an idiot. Christie doesn’t like guns. Trump is a joke. The RINOs are where they want to be right now with Myth virtually uncontested. Meanwhile the rest of us conservatives are wandering in the wilderness, sucking hind tit, wondering who is going to come to our rescue.
Off topic, but here is a possible REAL question:
If it’s Romney vs. Obama will you vote for Romney or sit out the election?
I'll get piss-drunk, wear a gas mask, and vote for Mittens.
“sucking hind tit, wondering who is going to come to our rescue.”
Sucking hind tit is no place to be.
Will you sit out a Cain election process?