All the information is available to everyone who is willing to punch links.
The NW article is kind of like propaganda. There's some truth in it; the Court went out of bounds (they didn't even need to prepare a decision here); and the decision has many more factoids than the news article.
None of us agree with the decision ~ it's too broad for the sort of case involved, and it's simply hypothetical. You don't expect that sort of nonsense out of a top end court.
On the other hand there was no unlawful entry ~ just a punk POd at his estanged wife and thinking he ought to push around the cops she'd called to her apartment!
There are limits ~ and all that happened is this punk got tazered. In the old days he'd have broken bones I am sure. Ain't modern science great stuff!
DOH!
Should have dug deeper...
Yep, the perp was a jerk. The trial lawyer has made a name for himself!
The judge is now infamous in many minds here...
If that is true then why the non-stop posting to everyone who finds the decision disagreeable?