[TigersEye]

None of us agree with the decision ~ it's too broad for the sort of case involved, and it's simply hypothetical. You don't expect that sort of nonsense out of a top end court.

If that is true then why the non-stop posting to everyone who finds the decision disagreeable?

[muawiyah]

Because there's a small circle of folks who Limbaugh calls "seminar callers" at work ~ and they are using this poorly written article to lead folks to say exciting things about judges.

I can't handle it all but we've had some "name posters" here who failed to read the case itself and ended up mis-speaking.

This is the sort of thing we have to keep ahead of in campaign season.