Posted on 05/13/2011 10:39:53 AM PDT by Sonny M
I know this sounds a little out there, and I hope I don't get flamed (I'm putting on the safety suit anyway), but what if Sarah Palin doesn't run ?
I'm not saying she won't, I'm not hoping she won't, If she does, I fully intend to support her, but what if she does not run?
Who would you support in the primary then ?
Personally, I'd probably go with Michelle Bachman, but I know some would support Huckabee (personally, I'm not a fan of his), some would support Romney (and I will NEVER ever support him), others might choose Hermain Cain, or Governor Mitch Daniels, or Former Speaker Newt Gingrich or Congressman Ron Paul....
I'm interested, does anyone have a "back up" candidate in case Palin doesn't run ?
You remind me of marxist libtards who really do not believe they are marxists based on their own little college textbook definitions. They do not call people like you “useful idiots” for nothing.
Romney, Huckabee, and Gingrich are all socialists because they believe in government control of private institutions and businesses that are much better off when left alone.
Yeah, people who actually know something about Marxism cannot be acceptable to those who exist merely to throw wild rhetoric bombs. One who pretends to know something about Marxism and/or communism should at least read what the man says.
Of course, older people such as I had the advantage of actually having Communism examined in their high schools and its flaws and failures explained. But it isn’t too late for you to read “Animal Farm”, “Darkness at Noon” if you can’t handle “Das Kapital” which admittedly is heavy lifting.
AS I FIGURED you cannot list ONE Republican who has called for the proletariat seizing the means of production even though I allowed you to go with the soft method of nationalization. You can’t even name ONE. So your claim is OBVIOUSLY a lie.
You really should not debate people who actually know something about the subject under discussion, stick to ignorant teenagers or congenital dumbasses.
What institutions and businesses have R, H and G (none of whom I support) suggested should be under government control?
I did not realize you just came out of a bomb shelter you had been in since the 1950s. My apologies.
Just google Romneycare or look up what Gingrich just said about healthcare.
2011 conservative American patriots take a dim view of those who propose more governement as a solution to every social problem.
I guess you would not understand, since you missed the LBJ, Carter, and Clinton years.
Neither of those examples are seizures of the means of production. You are confused about the difference between government regulation and government ownership among other things. Even us bomb shelter residents understand that simple distinction maybe you should go into one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.