[frog in a pot]

Wikipedia is supported by Stanley Ann and her attorney who stated in SA’s divorce pleadings v Sr. that they were married on 2-2-61. That may be the best evidence.

The official gov document may include an ordinary mistake. If the date was submitted intentionally, however, the question is what factual pattern might be established with a 1959 marriage?

Does it fit an older age? Or, was it just another example of a spiteful, immature response?

[Beckwith]

Stanley Ann and her attorney contend in the divorce pleadings that the two were married on 2-2-61. That is the ONLY evidence of a marriage.

The best evidence of a marriage would be a marriage license, or better yet, a state-issued marriage certificate.

Now, this should be easy to ascertain as marriages are public, but no marriage license or marriage certificate exists in the public domain.