To: howardl
Wikipedia is supported by Stanley Ann and her attorney who stated in SA’s divorce pleadings v Sr. that they were married on 2-2-61. That may be the best evidence.
The official gov document may include an ordinary mistake. If the date was submitted intentionally, however, the question is what factual pattern might be established with a 1959 marriage?
Does it fit an older age? Or, was it just another example of a spiteful, immature response?
28 posted on
05/12/2011 11:40:48 AM PDT by
frog in a pot
(There is a reason U.S. birth certificates designate the birthplace of the parents.)
To: frog in a pot
Stanley Ann and her attorney contend in the divorce pleadings that the two were married on 2-2-61. That is the ONLY evidence of a marriage.
The best evidence of a marriage would be a marriage license, or better yet, a state-issued marriage certificate.
Now, this should be easy to ascertain as marriages are public, but no marriage license or marriage certificate exists in the public domain.
36 posted on
05/12/2011 12:14:32 PM PDT by
Beckwith
(A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson