And the entire Republican party, from the high command to the state offices. Including people like Sarah Palin, John Boehner and John McCain, who could all be personally sitting in the White House right now by raising this simple, obvious point. Craven Obama flunkies!
And the Supreme Court, including Chief Justice John Roberts, a Bush appointee, who swore Barack Obama in himself. A closet Obama worshipper!
And every conservative establishment judge, lawyer, pundit and thinker alive. All of them taking Obama's coin and turning a blind eye!
And the radio or talk show hosts. Rush, Hannity, Beck, the lot of them. All shilling for Obama!
And the second string guys in pajamas, the blogosphere, always hungry for a hit, but unwilling to sniff this treat. Our name is Obama drone and we are legion!
And the posters on FR! All DU plants, who traveled back in time to sign on to FR before Obama was in office, just to discredit the true believers!
The whole world is in on it, except for Orly Taitz, Joe Farah, Jerome Corsi, Donald Trump, and the tireless Birther contingent on FR.
Is this about right? Did I miss anybody?
Nice list of Establishment types, except for Palin, who usually only care about being good buddies and reaching across the aisles to play kissy face with the Dems. This fight is to drag them along. These guys are not leaders but, people who are craven flunkies who put their collective wet fingers in the wind even before wiping their collectives butts.
And the radio or talk show hosts. Rush, Hannity, Beck, the lot of them. All shilling for Obama!
You really can't think for yourself can you? You need someone to hold your hand before you can say anything. Oh, so and so haven't come out and said it is not a forgery, so it must be real!
The whole world is in on it, except for Orly Taitz, Joe Farah, Jerome Corsi, Donald Trump, and the tireless Birther contingent on FR.
You still can't argue what has transpired in the real world but resort to obvious fallacious arguments
Must be a lemming...
I recall a time years ago when I finally had heard the term "Watergate" too many times without understanding the reference.
I started hunting for articles to explain what was going on. I typically found such articles buried in the back pages of my local newspaper. Initially it was just vague suspicions due to the obviously political purpose of the attempted wiretapping by the burglars.
It was many months before there were sufficient details to tie the crime and the subsequent coverup to persons associated with Nixon. Nixon even won re-election without any broad-based understanding of his involvement in the conspiracy.
But eventually a great deal of the truth came out. Five dozen high-ranking individuals, most of them lawyers, were convicted of felonies and Nixon himself resigned in disgrace, forced to release tapes documenting his own involvement from the beginning of the obstruction of justice.
The latest document released by Obama suggests that government officials in Hawaii may be involved in an effort to provide forged documents for Obama's benefit. Their behavior has been inconsistent and illogical. If what I am suggesting has occurred, I believe that it will come out.
Could you please provide your explanation for the unusual characteristics of the recently released document? Or do you remain uninterested, just like those who had no interest in why several Cuban refugees would burglarize the offices of a highly placed Democrat?