Posted on 05/08/2011 2:33:00 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
We just reported on Microsoft’s early previews of IE10, where the core concepts centralize around improving the browser’s”new web standards” approach and compatibility. This means that CSS 3 and HTML 5 are both going to be smoother, faster, and simply better as Internet Explorer continues development. However, pushing for these new web standards also has a peculiar drawback for Microsoft: it threatens other company products, such as Silverlight.
As HTML 5 becomes far more capable, Silverlight becomes far less necessary; while the unique advantages (such as smooth streaming and digital rights management) of the Microsoft alternative to flash were once crucial, they are now being made redundant. Microsoft’s awareness of this fact became painfully clear and Mix2011 when Giorgio Sardo gave a presentation on HTML 5 designed for current users of Silverlight.
It wasn’t simply the nature of the presentation, however; it was that Sardo himself was unable to give Silverlight his full support. He tip-toed around the subject for some time, making statements such as, “I’m sure you know your customers better than anyone else,” and, “I’m not going to judge which [Silverlight or HTML 5] works better.” However, Sardo did continue to state that HTML 5′s maturation over the past couple of years have made it a more versatile and capable development platform. “I believe HTML5 is ready,” said Sardo. “I think Microsoft is ready for HTML5.”
That pushes Silverlight into a more confined development world: that of offline development. While this does mean thatSilverlight will still have numerous uses (such as in tablet, smartphone, and desktop applications, or in enterprise programs such as Microsoft SharePoint), it will also be second best when contrasted with modern web standards. While Microsoft is defending the current but more limited uses of Silverlight, it’s clear that this once “on the cusp” technology is taking its back-seat position without too much complaint.
I am running XP, and certainly do not find IE even close to Firefox, and under Linux you would have to use it under WINE. Try Sea Monkey. And if you have an older PC, i think Linux Mint (i use the universal installer for legal issues) is better. http://www.linuxmint.com/edition.php?id=59
The problem for me is Firefox under XP. It is extremely slow to launch. I have looked at the add-ons — nothing obvious. Just seems like a lot of overhead to have Firefox if IE is as good.
It is hard for me to compare load times, as i usually have about 75 tabs to open in FF, but even though part of IE starts with Windows yet it takes about 20 seconds to load my Google home page when first starting, and sometimes hangs when opening pages. I use XP with 3GB ram, 2.8ghz Intel cpu.
And i rarely reboot my PC. Instead i just place it on Standby by pressing one shortcut key, and have it configured to do so automatically after a period of low cpu usage.
One purported fix for FF slow loading is to clean up the Java. See last post and link: http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/735623 Think i will try it also. Run it before other programs.
Also try the latest Firefox (4).
See here for adding FF to start menu: http://www.knowledgesutra.com/forums/topic/39012-how-to-make-firefox-load-faster-known-firefox-tweaks/
Thanks.
Flash and Silverlight were always going to be gap measures until HTML/CSS inevitably caught up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.