[marbren]

Hi esquirette, I introduced you to Matchett-PI because he is the clearest one I have found on amill, pretersist and partial preterist positions on FR. You mentioned that you tend toward partial preteist. You now have some good sources on FR as look for answers today. Obviously, Matchett-PI and I are on opposite sides of the debate that is OK. You are free to ask the Holy Spirit for the truth. Remember saying I don't know is a good place to be. I agree with Matchett-PI that he hates the term replacement theology and I embrace it and will continue to use it.

[esquirette]

Thanks, and pleased to meet you. The secret here, I think, is that prophecy in the Bible can be fulfilled more than once. God often gives us a glimpse and then the full picture. I see the point of preterism, but current events are very persuasive.

[Matchett-PI]

"I agree with Matchett-PI that he hates the term replacement theology"

What I hate are lies.

"Replacement Theology" is a derogatory term made up by dispensationalists used to label anyone who believes in Covenant (of grace & faith) Theology."