I used to give the scientists a far harder time than Creationists do but I didn't use insults or warnings of hell to do it. I questioned their premises with logic and points of established science. Sometimes it made them very mad but that's because they were put on the defensive with the flood of irrational flames they received.
“warnings of hell”
Belief in origins is not a salvation issue, for Christians, at least. It does seem to be a matter of extreme orthodoxy on the part of the evos, though.
“Science” cannot be used to prove either one, if I inferred from your post, we agree on that point.
Mostly because the conclusions about origins of either cannot be repeated. You can’t show “molecules to man” evolution any more than you could demonstrate supernatural creation in 6 days. This is where I take exception, when demeaning attacks come from the “scientists” when their conclusions are as much about pre-assumptions and faith as Creationism is.